Urology · 2002
Magnetic resonance imaging of scrotal diseases: when it makes the difference.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Muglia Valdair, Tucci Silvio, Elias Jorge, Trad Clóvis Simao, Bilbey James, Cooperberg Peter Leonard
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after inconclusive sonography in the evaluation of scrotal disease.
METHODS: From 1993 to 1999, 622 patients underwent ultrasonography (US) with state-of-the-art equipment to evaluate scrotal diseases. Twenty-six patients, two with bilateral and distinct diseases (age range 1--63 years, mean 33), had an inconclusive sonogram and were sent for MRI. The MRI results were compared with previous US reports and with the final diagnosis.
RESULTS: MRI yielded additional and correct information (compared with US), coincident with the final diagnosis in 23 cases (82.1%). In regard to lesions suspected of malignancy at US (17 cases), MRI had a great concordance with the final diagnosis and was statistically significant (P <0.002, kappa test).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that MRI could help elucidate scrotal dilemmas found at US, although the small percentage of inconclusive sonograms confirms this technique as the first choice when imaging is required in scrotal diseases.
METHODS: From 1993 to 1999, 622 patients underwent ultrasonography (US) with state-of-the-art equipment to evaluate scrotal diseases. Twenty-six patients, two with bilateral and distinct diseases (age range 1--63 years, mean 33), had an inconclusive sonogram and were sent for MRI. The MRI results were compared with previous US reports and with the final diagnosis.
RESULTS: MRI yielded additional and correct information (compared with US), coincident with the final diagnosis in 23 cases (82.1%). In regard to lesions suspected of malignancy at US (17 cases), MRI had a great concordance with the final diagnosis and was statistically significant (P <0.002, kappa test).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that MRI could help elucidate scrotal dilemmas found at US, although the small percentage of inconclusive sonograms confirms this technique as the first choice when imaging is required in scrotal diseases.