Chest · 2025
Low-Intensity vs Moderate-Intensity Anticoagulation for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Strategies for Anticoagulation During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Pilot Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gannon Whitney D, Pratt Elias H, Vogelsong Melissa A, Adkisson Wren H, Bacchetta Matthew, Bloom Sarah L, Ford Daniel J, Guenthart Brandon A, Landsperger Janna S, Qian Edward T, Rackley Craig R, Rice Todd W, Fielding-Singh Vikram, Stokes John W, Stollings Joanna L, Semler Matthew W, Casey Jonathan D, Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a common and sometimes fatal complication of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Whether lowering the intensity of anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO is safe or effective is unknown.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is a large, multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO feasible?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized pilot trial conducted at 3 centers across the United States, we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing venovenous ECMO to low-intensity or moderate-intensity anticoagulation. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment rate and adherence to the assigned anticoagulation strategy. The primary efficacy outcome was major bleeding, and the primary safety outcome was thromboembolic events, both assessed between enrollment and 24 hours after decannulation.
RESULTS: All of the 26 patients enrolled received the assigned intensity of anticoagulation. A major bleeding event occurred in 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group and in 4 of 14 patients (28.6%) in the moderate-intensity anticoagulation group (absolute risk difference, -20.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -48.6 to 8.1; P = .33). One patient experienced a thromboembolic event (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group compared with none in the moderate-intensity group (difference, 8.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.3 to 24.0; P = .46). No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events. No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events.
INTERPRETATION: Our results indicate that enrollment and separation between groups are feasible in a multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation for critically ill adults receiving venovenous ECMO. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed and seems to be feasible.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04997265; URL: www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is a large, multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation during venovenous ECMO feasible?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized pilot trial conducted at 3 centers across the United States, we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing venovenous ECMO to low-intensity or moderate-intensity anticoagulation. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment rate and adherence to the assigned anticoagulation strategy. The primary efficacy outcome was major bleeding, and the primary safety outcome was thromboembolic events, both assessed between enrollment and 24 hours after decannulation.
RESULTS: All of the 26 patients enrolled received the assigned intensity of anticoagulation. A major bleeding event occurred in 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group and in 4 of 14 patients (28.6%) in the moderate-intensity anticoagulation group (absolute risk difference, -20.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -48.6 to 8.1; P = .33). One patient experienced a thromboembolic event (8.3%) in the low-intensity anticoagulation group compared with none in the moderate-intensity group (difference, 8.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.3 to 24.0; P = .46). No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events. No patients died before discharge in the low-intensity anticoagulation group, compared with 2 patients (14.3%) in the moderate-intensity group, both of whom experienced major bleeding events.
INTERPRETATION: Our results indicate that enrollment and separation between groups are feasible in a multicenter randomized trial of low-intensity vs moderate-intensity anticoagulation for critically ill adults receiving venovenous ECMO. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed and seems to be feasible.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04997265; URL: www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov.