MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00595-021-02432-0

Медицинская библиотека · Surgery today · 2021

Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?

Kanamori Jun, Watanabe Masayuki, Maruyama Suguru, Kanie Yasukazu, Fujiwara Daisuke, Sakamoto Kei, Okamura Akihiko, Imamura Yu

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer has been performed increasingly frequently over the last few years. Robotic systems with articulated devices and tremor filtration allow surgeons to perform such procedures more meticulously than by hand. The feasibility of RAMIE has been demonstrated in several retrospective comparative studies, which showed similar short-term outcomes to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (cMIE). Considering the number of harvested lymph nodes, RAMIE may be superior to cMIE in terms of left upper mediastinal lymph node dissection. However, whether or not the addition of a robotic system to cMIE can help improve perioperative and oncological outcomes remains unclear. Given the lack of established evidence from randomized controlled trials, we must await the results of ongoing studies to reach any meaningful conclusions. Further advancements in robotic platforms, as well as the reduction in medical expenses, will be essential to demonstrate the real benefit of RAMIE.

Для цитирования: Kanamori Jun, Watanabe Masayuki, Maruyama Suguru, Kanie Yasukazu, Fujiwara Daisuke, Sakamoto Kei, Okamura Akihiko, Imamura Yu. Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?. Surgery today. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02432-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.