Annals of plastic surgery · 2019
Normal Speech Should be the Expected Outcome in the Adopted Cleft Child.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dempsey Robert Feigenbaum, Elsherbiny Ahmed, Amerson Meghan, Sconyers Laura, Grant John
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Significantly worse speech outcomes and higher complication rates are reported among internationally adopted cleft patients. We evaluated our cohort to provide more accurate counseling to adoptive parents.
METHODS: We reviewed internationally adopted children with unrepaired cleft palate who had 2-flap palatoplasty with radical intravelarveloplasty from 2003 to 2015 in a single-surgeon, consecutive series.
RESULTS: Seventy-two children adopted with unrepaired cleft palate were identified, 2 with syndromic association. The average age at palatoplasty was 28.1 months. Meaningful speech assessment was available in 58 patients. Successful speech was defined by a competent or borderline-competent velopharyngeal mechanism (Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score <2). Twenty-five patients (43%) had successful speech outcomes. Twenty-nine patients (50%) were recommended secondary operation for nasality. Nonfistula repair secondary operation was performed using the following: fat grafting (9 patients, 43%), intravelarveloplasty (8 patients, 38%), and sphincter pharyngoplasty (4 patients, 19%). The average Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score improved 5.8 to 1.3 (P = 1.3E-6); 4.8 to 1.0 (P = 0.0009) with fat grafting alone. After all interventions, normal speech was achieved in 43 (74%) of 58 patients. Palatal fistula (9.2% vs 0.9%, P = 0.001) and velopharyngeal insufficiency (50% vs 6.7%, P = 0.0004) rates were both significantly higher in the internationally adopted cohort than our nonadopted population data. The need for secondary surgery was independent of cleft type (P = 0.89), age (P = 0.78), or presence of a "wide" cleft (P = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate higher fistula and secondary surgery rates. Successful speech outcomes were achieved in most patients with minimally invasive secondary procedures.
METHODS: We reviewed internationally adopted children with unrepaired cleft palate who had 2-flap palatoplasty with radical intravelarveloplasty from 2003 to 2015 in a single-surgeon, consecutive series.
RESULTS: Seventy-two children adopted with unrepaired cleft palate were identified, 2 with syndromic association. The average age at palatoplasty was 28.1 months. Meaningful speech assessment was available in 58 patients. Successful speech was defined by a competent or borderline-competent velopharyngeal mechanism (Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score <2). Twenty-five patients (43%) had successful speech outcomes. Twenty-nine patients (50%) were recommended secondary operation for nasality. Nonfistula repair secondary operation was performed using the following: fat grafting (9 patients, 43%), intravelarveloplasty (8 patients, 38%), and sphincter pharyngoplasty (4 patients, 19%). The average Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score improved 5.8 to 1.3 (P = 1.3E-6); 4.8 to 1.0 (P = 0.0009) with fat grafting alone. After all interventions, normal speech was achieved in 43 (74%) of 58 patients. Palatal fistula (9.2% vs 0.9%, P = 0.001) and velopharyngeal insufficiency (50% vs 6.7%, P = 0.0004) rates were both significantly higher in the internationally adopted cohort than our nonadopted population data. The need for secondary surgery was independent of cleft type (P = 0.89), age (P = 0.78), or presence of a "wide" cleft (P = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate higher fistula and secondary surgery rates. Successful speech outcomes were achieved in most patients with minimally invasive secondary procedures.