Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite · 2013
[Cervical ripening at term with repeated administration of dinoprostone vaginal pessary].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Petrovic Barbitch M, Gnisci A, Marcelli M, Capelle M, Guidicelli B, Cravello L, Gamerre M, Agostini A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of cervical ripening with repeated administration of dinoprostone slow release vaginal pessary (Propess®) in current practice.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational study of 111 women who underwent cervical ripening with two Propess® during the study period from 1st July 2007 to 31st October 2011. Modes of delivery, success of cervical ripening, failure of labor induction, maternal and neonatal morbidity were reported.
RESULTS: The nulliparous rate was 75,7%. The main indications for induction of labor were post-term pregnancy in 34,3% (38/111) and premature rupture of membranes in 25,2% (28/111). The rate of vaginal delivery was 53,1% (59/111). Cesarean sections were performed for failure of labor induction in 27/52 (51,9%) and an abnormal fetal heart rate in 17/52 (32.7%). Indication for induction of labor, nulliparous patients (44 [84.6%] versus 40 [67.8%]; P=0.04), initial Bishop score (2.2±1.2 versus 2.9±1.2; P=0.04) before the cervical ripening and Bishop score before administration of second Propess® (3.3±1.4 versus 4.0±1.2; P=0.05) were significant risk factors of cesarean delivery.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In more than half of the cases, the cervical ripening by two Propess® is efficient and allows a vaginal delivery. This practice does not appear to increase the maternal or neonatal morbidity.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational study of 111 women who underwent cervical ripening with two Propess® during the study period from 1st July 2007 to 31st October 2011. Modes of delivery, success of cervical ripening, failure of labor induction, maternal and neonatal morbidity were reported.
RESULTS: The nulliparous rate was 75,7%. The main indications for induction of labor were post-term pregnancy in 34,3% (38/111) and premature rupture of membranes in 25,2% (28/111). The rate of vaginal delivery was 53,1% (59/111). Cesarean sections were performed for failure of labor induction in 27/52 (51,9%) and an abnormal fetal heart rate in 17/52 (32.7%). Indication for induction of labor, nulliparous patients (44 [84.6%] versus 40 [67.8%]; P=0.04), initial Bishop score (2.2±1.2 versus 2.9±1.2; P=0.04) before the cervical ripening and Bishop score before administration of second Propess® (3.3±1.4 versus 4.0±1.2; P=0.05) were significant risk factors of cesarean delivery.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In more than half of the cases, the cervical ripening by two Propess® is efficient and allows a vaginal delivery. This practice does not appear to increase the maternal or neonatal morbidity.