MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0126

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA neurology · 2024

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics of LGI1-Antibody and CASPR2-Antibody Encephalitis.

Kelly Mark J, Grant Eleanor, Murchison Andrew G, Binks Sophie, Ramanathan Sudarshini, Michael Sophia, Handel Adam E, Handunnetthi Lahiru, Uy Christopher E, Soltys John N, Dubey Divyanshu, Day Gregory S, Lopez-Chiriboga A Sebastian, Flanagan Eoin P, Sheerin Fintan, Irani Sarosh R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод требует повторной обработки

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis encourages prompt initiation of immunotherapy toward improved patient outcomes. However, clinical features alone may not sufficiently narrow the differential diagnosis, and awaiting autoantibody results can delay immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To identify simple magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics that accurately distinguish 2 common forms of autoimmune encephalitis, LGI1- and CASPR2-antibody encephalitis (LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E), from 2 major differential diagnoses, viral encephalitis (VE) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study involved a retrospective, blinded analysis of the first available brain MRIs (taken 2000-2022) from 192 patients at Oxford University Hospitals in the UK and Mayo Clinic in the US. These patients had LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E, VE, or CJD as evaluated by 2 neuroradiologists (discovery cohort; n = 87); findings were validated in an independent cohort by 3 neurologists (n = 105). Groups were statistically compared with contingency tables. Data were analyzed in 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: MRI findings including T2 or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensities, swelling or volume loss, presence of gadolinium contrast enhancement, and diffusion-weighted imaging changes. Correlations with clinical features.

RESULTS

Among 192 participants with MRIs reviewed, 71 were female (37%) and 121 were male (63%); the median age was 66 years (range, 19-92 years). By comparison with VE and CJD, in LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E, T2 and/or FLAIR hyperintensities were less likely to extend outside the temporal lobe (3/42 patients [7%] vs 17/18 patients [94%] with VE; P < .001, and 3/4 patients [75%] with CJD; P = .005), less frequently exhibited swelling (12/55 [22%] with LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E vs 13/22 [59%] with VE; P = .003), and showed no diffusion restriction (0 patients vs 16/22 [73%] with VE and 8/10 [80%] with CJD; both P < .001) and rare contrast enhancement (1/20 [5%] vs 7/17 [41%] with VE; P = .01). These findings were validated in an independent cohort and generated an area under the curve of 0.97, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 95% among cases with T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in the hippocampus and/or amygdala.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, T2 and/or FLAIR hyperintensities confined to the temporal lobes, without diffusion restriction or contrast enhancement, robustly distinguished LGI1/CASPR2-Ab-E from key differential diagnoses. These observations should assist clinical decision-making toward expediting immunotherapy. Their generalizability to other forms of autoimmune encephalitis and VE should be examined in future studies.

Для цитирования: Kelly Mark J, Grant Eleanor, Murchison Andrew G, Binks Sophie, Ramanathan Sudarshini, Michael Sophia, Handel Adam E, Handunnetthi Lahiru, Uy Christopher E, Soltys John N, Dubey Divyanshu, Day Gregory S, Lopez-Chiriboga A Sebastian, Flanagan Eoin P, Sheerin Fintan, Irani Sarosh R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics of LGI1-Antibody and CASPR2-Antibody Encephalitis.. JAMA neurology. 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0126.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.