A randomized comparative trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (Fungisome) versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in India.

BACKGROUND

In patients with persistent fever and netropenia, amphotericin B is administered empirically for early treatment and prevention of systemic fungal infections. Despite this treatment, there are chances of breakthrough fungal infections and drug is also toxic.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A multicentric, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare liposomal amphotericin B two doses with conventional amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy.

RESULTS

The average body weight of patients was 26.4 ± 14.8 (n=22), 32.9 ± 19.4 (n=23) and 37.9 ± 20.0 (n=20) kg in 1 mg, 3 mg Fungisome (liposomal amphotericin B) and 1 mg/kg/day conventional amphotericin B group, respectively. The mean age was 16.2 ± 13.4, 16.0 ± 10.9 and 22.7 ± 16.2 yrs in 1 and 3 mg/kg/day Fungisome and 1 mg/kg/day conventional AMP B group, respectively. The average duration of treatment with 1 mg and 3 mg/kg/day Fungisome and 1 mg/kg/day conventional amphotericin B was 17 ± 9.8, 16.2 ± 8.3, and 14.7 ± 10.7 days, respectively. The time to resolve fever was 13.3 ± 10.2, 10.9 ± 7.1, 10.1 ± 6.7 days, and for absolute neutrophil count (ANC) to be above 500 cells per microliter, it took 13.4 ± 9.6, 10.6 ± 7.6 and 7.3 ± 3.4 days, respectively. Liposomal formulations were well-tolerated compared to conventional amphotericin B.

CONCLUSIONS

This small randomized study showed that the indigenous liposomal formulation Fungisome appears to be equally efficacious and safer than conventional amphotericin B. Also, the lower dose Fungisome (1 mg/kg/day) appears to be equally efficacious and was well-tolerated as compared to higher dose Fungisome (3 mg/kg/day). Treatment cost would be a major factor for limiting use of higher dose of Fungisome.