Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses · 2024
Impact of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Caiping, Zhu Yongmei
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Perioperative respiratory adverse events continue to pose significant challenges in pediatric anesthesia. Research has hinted at a lower incidence of these complications in children anesthetized with propofol than sevoflurane. This study aimed to assess and compare respiratory complications in children undergoing general anesthesia with either sevoflurane or propofol during surgery.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and manual searches to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 19, 2023. The Cochrane risk assessment tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias in the selected studies. The pooled analysis of relevant data compared respiratory complications, vomiting, agitation, anesthesia duration, extubation time, and recovery time in pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol.
FINDINGS: A total of 17 RCTs, containing 1,758 pediatric participants, were included and analyzed. Respiratory adverse events were examined, encompassing laryngospasm, apnea, cough, and SpO2. In comparison to sevoflurane, children subjected to propofol anesthesia demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of laryngospasm (P = .001), vomiting (P < .001), and agitation (P = .029). Especially in patients receiving laryngeal mask airway, propofol anesthesia significantly reduced the incidence of laryngospasm (P = .003) and agitation (P < .001). At the same time, they exhibited an increased risk of apnea (P = .039). Notably, no statistically significant disparities were observed between sevoflurane and propofol concerning cough, SpO2 < 95%, anesthesia time, extubation time, and recovery time. Administration of propofol following sevoflurane anesthesia did not significantly impact the occurrence of vomiting or the recovery time.
CONCLUSIONS: While propofol presents an elevated risk of apnea, it concurrently yields a significant reduction in laryngospasm, vomiting, and agitation. Consequently, propofol emerges as a favorable anesthetic option for pediatric patients.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and manual searches to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 19, 2023. The Cochrane risk assessment tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias in the selected studies. The pooled analysis of relevant data compared respiratory complications, vomiting, agitation, anesthesia duration, extubation time, and recovery time in pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia with sevoflurane and propofol.
FINDINGS: A total of 17 RCTs, containing 1,758 pediatric participants, were included and analyzed. Respiratory adverse events were examined, encompassing laryngospasm, apnea, cough, and SpO2. In comparison to sevoflurane, children subjected to propofol anesthesia demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of laryngospasm (P = .001), vomiting (P < .001), and agitation (P = .029). Especially in patients receiving laryngeal mask airway, propofol anesthesia significantly reduced the incidence of laryngospasm (P = .003) and agitation (P < .001). At the same time, they exhibited an increased risk of apnea (P = .039). Notably, no statistically significant disparities were observed between sevoflurane and propofol concerning cough, SpO2 < 95%, anesthesia time, extubation time, and recovery time. Administration of propofol following sevoflurane anesthesia did not significantly impact the occurrence of vomiting or the recovery time.
CONCLUSIONS: While propofol presents an elevated risk of apnea, it concurrently yields a significant reduction in laryngospasm, vomiting, and agitation. Consequently, propofol emerges as a favorable anesthetic option for pediatric patients.