Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia · 2019
[Impact of renal replacement therapy on frail older adults].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huidobro E Juan Pablo, Ceriani Alejandro, Sepúlveda Rodrigo, Carrasco Marcela, Ortiz Ana Mireya
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: End-stage renal disease prevalence is increasing in older adults. Frailty is highly prevalent in older adults with end-stage renal disease. However, there are no prospective studies comparing the performance of the different modalities of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in frail older adults.
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinically relevant outcomes (hospital admission, falls, hip fractures, and mortality) in prefrail and frail older adults according to the modality of RRT: peritoneal dialysis or haemodialysis.
METHODS: A prospective observational study in prefrail and frail older adults (according to FRAIL scale) on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis was carried out. An evaluation was made using baseline characteristics (age, Charlson, body mass index, time on RRT, compliance with Kt/V dose, haemoglobin, and albumin). The patients were followed-up over 12 months, recording mortality, days and number of hospital admissions, falls, and hip fractures.
RESULTS: A total of 54/65 (83%) older adults on RRT met criteria for prefrailty or frailty, and signed informed consent (27 in each modality). Baseline characteristics were similar, except for serum albumin and time on RRT, both of which were significantly lower in the peritoneal dialysis group. The FRAIL score was similar in both groups. Baseline FRAIL correlated with higher comorbidity, lower albumin levels, and non-compliance of Kt/V dose, while it was independent of age, body mass index, and time on RRT. Days and number of hospital admissions at 12 months were similar in patients on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. Survival on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis was similar. There were no differences in falls or hip fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-frail and frail older adults on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis have similar clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinically relevant outcomes (hospital admission, falls, hip fractures, and mortality) in prefrail and frail older adults according to the modality of RRT: peritoneal dialysis or haemodialysis.
METHODS: A prospective observational study in prefrail and frail older adults (according to FRAIL scale) on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis was carried out. An evaluation was made using baseline characteristics (age, Charlson, body mass index, time on RRT, compliance with Kt/V dose, haemoglobin, and albumin). The patients were followed-up over 12 months, recording mortality, days and number of hospital admissions, falls, and hip fractures.
RESULTS: A total of 54/65 (83%) older adults on RRT met criteria for prefrailty or frailty, and signed informed consent (27 in each modality). Baseline characteristics were similar, except for serum albumin and time on RRT, both of which were significantly lower in the peritoneal dialysis group. The FRAIL score was similar in both groups. Baseline FRAIL correlated with higher comorbidity, lower albumin levels, and non-compliance of Kt/V dose, while it was independent of age, body mass index, and time on RRT. Days and number of hospital admissions at 12 months were similar in patients on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. Survival on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis was similar. There were no differences in falls or hip fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-frail and frail older adults on peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis have similar clinical outcomes.