DOI 10.1007/s10384-025-01207-1
Factors predictive of treatment outcomes in submacular hemorrhage secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To identify predictors for visual outcomes of eyes with submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective observational study.
METHODS
Clinical data from patients diagnosed with SMH secondary to nAMD and treated with pneumatic displacement were collected. SMH thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and 1 week. Possible factors associated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gain at 3 months were analyzed.
RESULTS
Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients (18 female/38 male; mean age, 77.8 ± 10.1 years) were analyzed; 34 were treatment-naïve and 22 were previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Multivariable analysis showed that greater BCVA gain more than 0.3 logMAR at 3 months post-treatment was associated with being treatment-naïve (odds ratio [OR], 34.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-851.91; P = 0.031), thinner SMH thickness at 1 week after pneumatic displacement (OR, 0.38 per 50-unit increase; CI, 0.18-0.80; P = 0.011), and worse baseline BCVA (OR, 2.58 per 0.1-unit increase; CI, 1.31-5.07; P = 0.006), but not associated with age (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-1.06), the time from onset to pneumatic displacement (OR, 1.04; 95%CI, 0.87-1.23), SMH thickness at baseline (OR, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.63-1.36), and the presence of subfoveal hemorrhagic PED (OR, 0.72; 95%CI, 0.08-6.84).
CONCLUSION
This study identifies novel factors predictive of visual outcomes for pneumatic displacement for SMH due to nAMD. The presence of residual SMH at 1 week following unsuccessful pneumatic displacement may warrant further intervention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.