The Laryngoscope · 2025
Risk Analysis Index Versus Modified Frailty Index: Outcomes After Otolaryngologic Surgery.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Evans Lauran K, Tamamian Carine, Delavary Desiree, Lin Matthew E, Yang Hong-Ho, St John Maie, Chhetri Dinesh K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Patient frailty negatively impacts postsurgical outcomes across multiple specialties. Commonly used frailty scoring systems include the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (MFI-5) and the Clinical Risk Analysis Index (RAI-C). We compared these frailty indices in predicting postsurgical outcomes in otolaryngology, a comparison that has never been completed to date.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgery at a quaternary care medical center (2022-2024) with an RAI-C score available for analysis. Chi-square analysis and ROC curves were utilized to determine associations and predictive ability of each scoring system.
RESULTS: Among 1209 patients, 21% met MFI-5 frailty criteria (MFI-5 score > 1), and 23% met RAI-C frailty criteria (RAI-C score > 30). The Pearson correlation coefficient between MFI-5 and RAI-C was 0.481 (95% CI [0.43, 0.53]), indicating a moderate correlation between the two metrics. Patients deemed frail by RAI-C had 5.7 times higher odds of experiencing a postoperative complication than non-frail counterparts (95% CI [3.51, 9.28], p < 0.0001), but MFI-5 frailty status was not associated with postoperative complications. Both RAI-C and MFI-5 demonstrated significant predictive ability for 30-day readmission (AUC 0.77, 95% CI [0.64, 0.89] vs. AUC 0.76, 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]), respectively. When compared to MFI-5, RAI-C had greater predictive performance for all other postoperative outcomes in this study.
CONCLUSION: RAI-C outperformed MFI-5 in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgeries. RAI-C assessment should be considered in frailty research, multidisciplinary treatment planning, and managing patient expectations and outcomes.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgery at a quaternary care medical center (2022-2024) with an RAI-C score available for analysis. Chi-square analysis and ROC curves were utilized to determine associations and predictive ability of each scoring system.
RESULTS: Among 1209 patients, 21% met MFI-5 frailty criteria (MFI-5 score > 1), and 23% met RAI-C frailty criteria (RAI-C score > 30). The Pearson correlation coefficient between MFI-5 and RAI-C was 0.481 (95% CI [0.43, 0.53]), indicating a moderate correlation between the two metrics. Patients deemed frail by RAI-C had 5.7 times higher odds of experiencing a postoperative complication than non-frail counterparts (95% CI [3.51, 9.28], p < 0.0001), but MFI-5 frailty status was not associated with postoperative complications. Both RAI-C and MFI-5 demonstrated significant predictive ability for 30-day readmission (AUC 0.77, 95% CI [0.64, 0.89] vs. AUC 0.76, 95% CI [0.61, 0.88]), respectively. When compared to MFI-5, RAI-C had greater predictive performance for all other postoperative outcomes in this study.
CONCLUSION: RAI-C outperformed MFI-5 in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgeries. RAI-C assessment should be considered in frailty research, multidisciplinary treatment planning, and managing patient expectations and outcomes.