Critical care medicine · 1997
Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output in critically ill patients by analysis of the finger blood pressure waveform.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hirschl M M, Binder M, Gwechenberger M, Herkner H, Bur A, Kittler H, Laggner A N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the measurement of cardiac output by computer-assisted analysis of the finger blood pressure waveform can substitute for the thermodilution method in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective data collection.
SETTING: Emergency department in a 2000-bed inner city hospital
PATIENTS: Forty-six critically ill patients requiring invasive monitoring for clinical management were prospectively studied.
INTERVENTIONS: Under local anesthesia a 7-Fr pulmonary artery catheter was inserted via the central subclavian or jugular vein. Cardiac output was determined by the use of a cardiac output computer and injections of 10 mL ice-cold glucose 5%. Noninvasive cardiac output was calculated from the finger blood pressure waveform by the use of the test software program.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-three pairs of invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic measurements were collected in intervals of 30 mins from 46 patients (mean age 61.9 +/- 12.4 yrs; 35 male, 11 female). The average cardiac index during the study period was 2.83 L/min/m2 (range 0.97 to 5.56). The overall discrepancy between both measurements was 0.14 L/min/m2 (95% confidence interval: 0.10-.018, p < .001). Seventy-five (23.2%) measurements had an absolute discrepancy > +/- 0.50 L/min/m2. Noninvasive and invasive comparisons of mean differential cardiac output were out of phase for 9.7% of all readings.
CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted analysis of finger blood pressure waveform to assess cardiac output is not a substitute for the thermodilution method due to a high percentage (23.2%) of inaccurate readings; however, it may be a useful tool for the detection of relative hemodynamic trends in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective data collection.
SETTING: Emergency department in a 2000-bed inner city hospital
PATIENTS: Forty-six critically ill patients requiring invasive monitoring for clinical management were prospectively studied.
INTERVENTIONS: Under local anesthesia a 7-Fr pulmonary artery catheter was inserted via the central subclavian or jugular vein. Cardiac output was determined by the use of a cardiac output computer and injections of 10 mL ice-cold glucose 5%. Noninvasive cardiac output was calculated from the finger blood pressure waveform by the use of the test software program.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-three pairs of invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic measurements were collected in intervals of 30 mins from 46 patients (mean age 61.9 +/- 12.4 yrs; 35 male, 11 female). The average cardiac index during the study period was 2.83 L/min/m2 (range 0.97 to 5.56). The overall discrepancy between both measurements was 0.14 L/min/m2 (95% confidence interval: 0.10-.018, p < .001). Seventy-five (23.2%) measurements had an absolute discrepancy > +/- 0.50 L/min/m2. Noninvasive and invasive comparisons of mean differential cardiac output were out of phase for 9.7% of all readings.
CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted analysis of finger blood pressure waveform to assess cardiac output is not a substitute for the thermodilution method due to a high percentage (23.2%) of inaccurate readings; however, it may be a useful tool for the detection of relative hemodynamic trends in critically ill patients.