International journal of cardiology · 2015
Blood-based microRNA signatures differentiate various forms of cardiac hypertrophy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Derda Anselm A, Thum Sabrina, Lorenzen Johan M, Bavendiek Udo, Heineke Joerg, Keyser Britta, Stuhrmann Manfred, Givens Raymond C, Kennel Peter J, Schulze P Christian, Widder Julian D, Bauersachs Johann, Thum Thomas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is caused by mutations in different structural genes and induces pathological hypertrophy with sudden cardiac death as a possible consequence. HCM can be separated into hypertrophic non-obstructive and obstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM/HOCM) with different clinical treatment approaches. We here distinguished between HNCM, HOCM, cardiac amyloidosis and aortic stenosis by using microRNA profiling and investigated potential interactions between circulating miRNA levels and the most common mutations in MYH7and MYBPC3 genes.
METHODS: Our study included 4 different groups: 23 patients with HNCM, 28 patients with HOCM, 47 patients with aortic stenosis and 22 healthy controls. Based on previous findings, 8 different cardiovascular known microRNAs (miR-1, miR-21, miR-29a, miR-29b, miR-29c, miR-133a, miR-155 and miR-499) were studied in serum of all patients and compared with clinically available patient data.
RESULTS: We found miR-29a levels to be increased in patients with HOCM and correlating markers of cardiac hypertrophy. This was not the case in HNCM patients. In contrast, we identified miR-29c to be upregulated in aortic stenosis but not the other patient groups. ROC curve analysis of miR-29a/c distinguished between HOCM patients and aortic stenosis patients. MiR-29a and miR-155 levels discriminated HNCM patients from patients with senile cardiac amyloidosis. MiR-29a increased mainly in HOCM patients with a mutation in MYH7, whereas miR-155 was decreased in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with a mutation in MYBPC3.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that miR-29a and miR-29c show a specific signature to distinguish between aortic stenosis, hypertrophic non-obstructive and obstructive cardiomyopathies and thus could be developed into clinically useful biomarkers.
METHODS: Our study included 4 different groups: 23 patients with HNCM, 28 patients with HOCM, 47 patients with aortic stenosis and 22 healthy controls. Based on previous findings, 8 different cardiovascular known microRNAs (miR-1, miR-21, miR-29a, miR-29b, miR-29c, miR-133a, miR-155 and miR-499) were studied in serum of all patients and compared with clinically available patient data.
RESULTS: We found miR-29a levels to be increased in patients with HOCM and correlating markers of cardiac hypertrophy. This was not the case in HNCM patients. In contrast, we identified miR-29c to be upregulated in aortic stenosis but not the other patient groups. ROC curve analysis of miR-29a/c distinguished between HOCM patients and aortic stenosis patients. MiR-29a and miR-155 levels discriminated HNCM patients from patients with senile cardiac amyloidosis. MiR-29a increased mainly in HOCM patients with a mutation in MYH7, whereas miR-155 was decreased in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with a mutation in MYBPC3.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that miR-29a and miR-29c show a specific signature to distinguish between aortic stenosis, hypertrophic non-obstructive and obstructive cardiomyopathies and thus could be developed into clinically useful biomarkers.