European urology · 2008
Laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty: results and outcome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
el-Feel Ahmed, Abdel-Hakim Mahmoud A, Abouel-Fettouh Hazem, Abdel-Hakim Amr M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Routine use of laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty has not yet been established.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcome of laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three patients underwent laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty for hypocompliant bladder.
INTERVENTION: Bladder dissection and reconstruction of the ileovesical anastomosis were performed laparoscopically, whereas the ileal pouch was prepared extracorporeally through a small 3- to 4-cm muscle-splitting incision.
MEASUREMENTS: Patient data, operative details, and follow-up were recorded. Urodynamic evaluation was performed preoperatively and after 12 mo, taking the bladder capacity and the maximum detrusor pressure as a measure for the outcome of the procedure.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All cases were completed laparoscopically, with a mean operative time 202 min; mean hospital stay 5 d, and mean urethral catheter duration 11 d. After 12 mo, the estimated bladder volume increased from a mean 111 ml to 788 ml (p<0.01), whereas the maximum detrusor pressure dropped from a mean 92 cm H(2)O to 15 cm H(2)O (p<0.01). During a mean follow-up of 39 mo, two long-term complications have been reported: bladder stone and spontaneous rupture of the augmented bladder due to neglected clean intermittent self-catheterization.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty is a safe procedure, technically feasible and with favourable urodynamic outcome.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcome of laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three patients underwent laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty for hypocompliant bladder.
INTERVENTION: Bladder dissection and reconstruction of the ileovesical anastomosis were performed laparoscopically, whereas the ileal pouch was prepared extracorporeally through a small 3- to 4-cm muscle-splitting incision.
MEASUREMENTS: Patient data, operative details, and follow-up were recorded. Urodynamic evaluation was performed preoperatively and after 12 mo, taking the bladder capacity and the maximum detrusor pressure as a measure for the outcome of the procedure.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All cases were completed laparoscopically, with a mean operative time 202 min; mean hospital stay 5 d, and mean urethral catheter duration 11 d. After 12 mo, the estimated bladder volume increased from a mean 111 ml to 788 ml (p<0.01), whereas the maximum detrusor pressure dropped from a mean 92 cm H(2)O to 15 cm H(2)O (p<0.01). During a mean follow-up of 39 mo, two long-term complications have been reported: bladder stone and spontaneous rupture of the augmented bladder due to neglected clean intermittent self-catheterization.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty is a safe procedure, technically feasible and with favourable urodynamic outcome.