Pediatric radiology · 2025
Using deep learning for estimation of time-since-injury in pediatric accidental fractures.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brink Farah W, Adler Brent, Bambach Sven, Lo Charmaine B, Rust Steven, Bartlett Christopher W, Bradshaw Logan, Henry M Katherine, Messer Diana
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Estimating time-since-injury of healing fractures is imprecise, encompassing excessively wide timeframes. Most injured children are evaluated at non-children's hospitals, yet pediatric radiologists can disagree with up to one in six skeletal imaging interpretations from referring community hospitals. There is a need to improve image interpretation by considering additional methods for fracture dating.
OBJECTIVE: To train and validate deep learning models to correctly estimate the age of pediatric accidental long bone fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This secondary data analysis used radiographic images of accidental long bone fractures in children <6 years at the time of injury seen at a large Midwestern children's hospital between 2000-2016. We built deep learning models both to classify fracture images into different age groups and to directly estimate fracture age (time-since-injury). We used cross-validation to evaluate model performance across various metrics, including confusion matrices, sensitivity/specificity, and activation maps for age classification, and mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) for age estimation.
RESULTS: Our study cohort contained 2,328 radiographs from 399 patients. Overall, our models performed above baselines for fracture age classification and estimation, both when trained/validated across all bones and on specific bone types. The best model was able to estimate fracture age for any long bone with a MAE of 6.2 days and with 68% of estimates falling within 7 days of the correct fracture age.
CONCLUSION: Our study successfully demonstrated that, for radiographic dating of accidental fractures of long bones, deep learning models can estimate time-since-injury with above-baseline accuracy.
OBJECTIVE: To train and validate deep learning models to correctly estimate the age of pediatric accidental long bone fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This secondary data analysis used radiographic images of accidental long bone fractures in children <6 years at the time of injury seen at a large Midwestern children's hospital between 2000-2016. We built deep learning models both to classify fracture images into different age groups and to directly estimate fracture age (time-since-injury). We used cross-validation to evaluate model performance across various metrics, including confusion matrices, sensitivity/specificity, and activation maps for age classification, and mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) for age estimation.
RESULTS: Our study cohort contained 2,328 radiographs from 399 patients. Overall, our models performed above baselines for fracture age classification and estimation, both when trained/validated across all bones and on specific bone types. The best model was able to estimate fracture age for any long bone with a MAE of 6.2 days and with 68% of estimates falling within 7 days of the correct fracture age.
CONCLUSION: Our study successfully demonstrated that, for radiographic dating of accidental fractures of long bones, deep learning models can estimate time-since-injury with above-baseline accuracy.