Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja · 2012
Stress fractures in children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sułko Jerzy, Oberc Artur
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Presentation of own experiences, observations and results of treatment of patients with stress fractures treated in the Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics. The authors present an algorithm of diagnosing and treatment of stress fractures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over the period 1998 - 2010, 38 patients were hospitalised (40 fractures) with the final diagnosis of stress fracture. Personal patients' data, case histories and management preceding the diagnosis of the disease, diagnostic and therapeutic methods, as well as the results of treatment were collected on the basis of medical documentation. Standard diagnostic procedure consisted of: clinical and radiological examination, laboratory tests as well as computed tomography (CT). In 11 cases, the procedure included also scintigraphy and in two children MRI scan was performed.
RESULTS: Complete healing of fractures was finally achieved in all patients
CONCLUSIONS: In case of suspected stress fracture, it is necessary to perform a series of radiograms, which should present the picture of bone rebuilding and incorporation of the periosteal callus. If plain radiograph is inconclusive we should consider MRI , CT or scintigraphy scan. The results of laboratory tests should not show any abnormalities. In case of confirmed stress fracture nonweight-bearing of the affected extremity is recommended as well as introducing of close clinical-radiological monitoring. The results of MRI examination should be interpreted very cautiously, be cause it can be misleading. The observation strategy (“wait and see”) should be implemented. However, the lack of the regression of pain sensation, bone rebuilding features and incorporation of periosteal callus or the appearance of visible bone destruction (lysis) should raise questions and present an indication for taking biopsy of the laesion.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over the period 1998 - 2010, 38 patients were hospitalised (40 fractures) with the final diagnosis of stress fracture. Personal patients' data, case histories and management preceding the diagnosis of the disease, diagnostic and therapeutic methods, as well as the results of treatment were collected on the basis of medical documentation. Standard diagnostic procedure consisted of: clinical and radiological examination, laboratory tests as well as computed tomography (CT). In 11 cases, the procedure included also scintigraphy and in two children MRI scan was performed.
RESULTS: Complete healing of fractures was finally achieved in all patients
CONCLUSIONS: In case of suspected stress fracture, it is necessary to perform a series of radiograms, which should present the picture of bone rebuilding and incorporation of the periosteal callus. If plain radiograph is inconclusive we should consider MRI , CT or scintigraphy scan. The results of laboratory tests should not show any abnormalities. In case of confirmed stress fracture nonweight-bearing of the affected extremity is recommended as well as introducing of close clinical-radiological monitoring. The results of MRI examination should be interpreted very cautiously, be cause it can be misleading. The observation strategy (“wait and see”) should be implemented. However, the lack of the regression of pain sensation, bone rebuilding features and incorporation of periosteal callus or the appearance of visible bone destruction (lysis) should raise questions and present an indication for taking biopsy of the laesion.