Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2010
Possible cross-cultural differences in the perception of impact of voice disorders.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yiu Edwin M-L, Ho Elaine M, Ma Estella P-M, Verdolini Abbott Katherine, Branski Ryan, Richardson Katherine, Li Nicole Y-K
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Perception of the impact of voice disorders may differ across different cultural backgrounds. This study investigated the difference in the perception of the impact of voice disorders between the American (Pittsburgh) and Chinese (Hong Kong) cultures.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Sixty dysphonic subjects from Hong Kong, China, and 60 dysphonic subjects from Pittsburgh, USA, were recruited to complete the Chinese and English versions of the Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), respectively. Data analyses using independent t tests were conducted on (1) the total profile scores; (b) total activity limitation score (ALS) and total participation restriction score (PRS); (c) section scores of job, daily communication, and social communication; and (d) section ALS and section PRS.
RESULTS: Hong Kong subjects showed significantly higher scores than the Pittsburgh subjects in total profile and other subsections except in the job PRS.
CONCLUSION: RESULTS support the possible influence of individualist and collectivist cultures on the perceived impact of voice disorders on the activity and participation.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Sixty dysphonic subjects from Hong Kong, China, and 60 dysphonic subjects from Pittsburgh, USA, were recruited to complete the Chinese and English versions of the Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), respectively. Data analyses using independent t tests were conducted on (1) the total profile scores; (b) total activity limitation score (ALS) and total participation restriction score (PRS); (c) section scores of job, daily communication, and social communication; and (d) section ALS and section PRS.
RESULTS: Hong Kong subjects showed significantly higher scores than the Pittsburgh subjects in total profile and other subsections except in the job PRS.
CONCLUSION: RESULTS support the possible influence of individualist and collectivist cultures on the perceived impact of voice disorders on the activity and participation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Activities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultAsian PeopleCommunicationCost of IllnessCross-Cultural ComparisonCultural CharacteristicsDisability EvaluationDysphoniaEmploymentFemaleHong KongHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaQuality of LifeSelf ConceptSeverity of Illness IndexVoice QualityWhite PeopleYoung Adult