The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2013
Novel method for laryngotracheal reconstruction: combining single- and double-stage techniques.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Setlur Jennifer, Maturo Stephen, Hartnick Christopher J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Traditional open techniques for laryngotracheal reconstruction are either single- or double-stage procedures. Some patients may benefit from the presence of a long, single-tube stent, such as an endotracheal tube, but their predicted need for a 2-stage procedure and a persistent tracheostomy is high. We describe a novel technique for airway reconstruction that combines the methods of both single- and double-stage procedures.
METHODS: We present a retrospective review of 4 patients. All patients underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction by a single surgeon. After the operation, the airway was stented with nasotracheal intubation. A small stent, fashioned from an endotracheal tube, was placed in the tracheostoma to keep it patent. The patients subsequently underwent extubation and replacement of the tracheostomy tube.
RESULTS: The study included 1 patient with grade 4 subglottic stenosis, 2 patients with grade 3 subglottic stenosis, and 1 patient with a posterior glottic scar. All were tracheostomy tube-dependent. Serial bronchoscopy was used to follow the patients for a minimum of 9 months after the operation. All 4 patients have since met the criteria for decannulation.
CONCLUSIONS: This hybrid reconstruction merges the advantages of both the single- and double-stage procedures. It adds versatility to the surgical toolbox for airway reconstruction.
METHODS: We present a retrospective review of 4 patients. All patients underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction by a single surgeon. After the operation, the airway was stented with nasotracheal intubation. A small stent, fashioned from an endotracheal tube, was placed in the tracheostoma to keep it patent. The patients subsequently underwent extubation and replacement of the tracheostomy tube.
RESULTS: The study included 1 patient with grade 4 subglottic stenosis, 2 patients with grade 3 subglottic stenosis, and 1 patient with a posterior glottic scar. All were tracheostomy tube-dependent. Serial bronchoscopy was used to follow the patients for a minimum of 9 months after the operation. All 4 patients have since met the criteria for decannulation.
CONCLUSIONS: This hybrid reconstruction merges the advantages of both the single- and double-stage procedures. It adds versatility to the surgical toolbox for airway reconstruction.