Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2014
Topical mitomycin-C application in recurrent esophageal strictures after surgical repair of esophageal atresia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chapuy Laurence, Pomerleau Martine, Faure Christophe
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and short-term safety of topical mitomycin-C, an antifibrotic agent, in preventing the recurrence of anastomotic strictures after surgical repair of esophageal atresia (EA).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with recurrent anastomotic strictures after EA surgery who underwent at least 3 esophageal dilations. We compared the outcome (ie, resolution of the stricture) of the group that received topical mitomycin-C treatment with endoscopic esophageal dilation with a historical cohort treated by dilations alone.
RESULTS: A total of 11 children received mitomycin-C concurrently with endoscopic dilations. After a median follow-up of 33 months (range 18-72), and a mean number of 5.4 dilations per patient (range 3-11), 8 of 11 patients achieved a resolution of their strictures, 2 patients remained with stenosis, and 1 patient needed a surgical correction. In the control group, 10 patients required an average of 3.7 (range 3-7) total dilations. After a follow-up of 125 months (range 35-266) after the last dilation, strictures in 9 of 10 children disappeared and the remaining patient was symptom free. No dysplasia related to mitomycin-C was demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no benefit in the resolution of the stricture when adding mitomycin-C treatment compared with repeated esophageal dilations alone in historical controls. Further randomized controlled studies and a short- and long-term evaluation of safety are needed.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with recurrent anastomotic strictures after EA surgery who underwent at least 3 esophageal dilations. We compared the outcome (ie, resolution of the stricture) of the group that received topical mitomycin-C treatment with endoscopic esophageal dilation with a historical cohort treated by dilations alone.
RESULTS: A total of 11 children received mitomycin-C concurrently with endoscopic dilations. After a median follow-up of 33 months (range 18-72), and a mean number of 5.4 dilations per patient (range 3-11), 8 of 11 patients achieved a resolution of their strictures, 2 patients remained with stenosis, and 1 patient needed a surgical correction. In the control group, 10 patients required an average of 3.7 (range 3-7) total dilations. After a follow-up of 125 months (range 35-266) after the last dilation, strictures in 9 of 10 children disappeared and the remaining patient was symptom free. No dysplasia related to mitomycin-C was demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no benefit in the resolution of the stricture when adding mitomycin-C treatment compared with repeated esophageal dilations alone in historical controls. Further randomized controlled studies and a short- and long-term evaluation of safety are needed.