Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025
Postoperative anticoagulation in patients with microvascular reconstruction - a systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bleymehl Moritz, Moratin Julius, Smielowski Maximilian, Schnug Gregor, Rückschloß Thomas, Busch Cornelius, Engel Michael, Hoffmann Jürgen, Ristow Oliver
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the currently applied regimens of antithrombotic therapy after microvascular reconstruction.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed Database for work published until September 2022. Data synthesis and risk of bias were reported in accordance with NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools guidelines.
RESULTS: 204 articles were found including the keywords either in the abstract or in the title. After screening their abstracts and titles, 41 articles were identified as suitable and the full texts were retrieved. 23 studies were included in this review. No gold standard could be shown; on the contrary, the applied antithrombotic regimens varied widely. A broad consensus could be obtained that Dextran should no longer be used after an increased complication rate was proven. The most commonly used agents are unfractionated (UFH) as well as low molecular weight (LMWH) heparin and acetylsalecylic acid (ASA), although the literature results are partly contradictory.
CONCLUSIONS: A consensus could be found that it is useful to perform thromboprophylaxis when the patient is immobilized, but there is no evidence for a survival advantage of the flap by chemical prophylaxis. On the contrary, it has been shown that there is an increased rate of bleeding complications and flap loss combined with the simultaneous use of multiple chemical anticoagulants. In conclusion the generalized use of anticoagulation is explained less by microvascular grafting than by general medical risk factors. Thus, large prospective RCTs will be needed to establish a gold standard therapeutic regimen.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using the MEDLINE/PubMed Database for work published until September 2022. Data synthesis and risk of bias were reported in accordance with NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools guidelines.
RESULTS: 204 articles were found including the keywords either in the abstract or in the title. After screening their abstracts and titles, 41 articles were identified as suitable and the full texts were retrieved. 23 studies were included in this review. No gold standard could be shown; on the contrary, the applied antithrombotic regimens varied widely. A broad consensus could be obtained that Dextran should no longer be used after an increased complication rate was proven. The most commonly used agents are unfractionated (UFH) as well as low molecular weight (LMWH) heparin and acetylsalecylic acid (ASA), although the literature results are partly contradictory.
CONCLUSIONS: A consensus could be found that it is useful to perform thromboprophylaxis when the patient is immobilized, but there is no evidence for a survival advantage of the flap by chemical prophylaxis. On the contrary, it has been shown that there is an increased rate of bleeding complications and flap loss combined with the simultaneous use of multiple chemical anticoagulants. In conclusion the generalized use of anticoagulation is explained less by microvascular grafting than by general medical risk factors. Thus, large prospective RCTs will be needed to establish a gold standard therapeutic regimen.