The journal of contemporary dental practice · 2012
Mandibular reconstruction using AO/ASIF stainless steel reconstruction plate: a retrospective study of 36 cases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Harsha G, Reddy S Ganesh Kumar, Talasila Sunil, Salaam S Abdus, Srinivasulu M, Reddy V Sridhar
Аннотация
AIM: The study was aimed at esthetic and functional results as well as patient tolerance after reconstruction with reconstruction plate. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 36 patients who had mandibular reconstruction with AO/ASIF stainless steel reconstruction plates after oncologic resection was evaluated. The indications and postoperative outcomes were studied.
RESULTS: At the end of study, 24 of 36 patients (67%) still had the plate in place. Around three (8%) plates were fractured. Nine (25%) plates got exposed leading to surgical intervention. Surgical results were satisfying, particularly when looking at delayed healing or long-term tolerance. Esthetic (79% rated results as good or acceptable) and functional results of this reconstruction were satisfying.
CONCLUSION: We conclude by saying that reconstruction plate provides a solution for safe and rapid mandibular reconstruction for patients with poor prognosis or poor condition. This method also preserves the possibility of secondary reconstruction.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The reconstruction plate may be a good clinical choice for safe and rapid mandibular reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 36 patients who had mandibular reconstruction with AO/ASIF stainless steel reconstruction plates after oncologic resection was evaluated. The indications and postoperative outcomes were studied.
RESULTS: At the end of study, 24 of 36 patients (67%) still had the plate in place. Around three (8%) plates were fractured. Nine (25%) plates got exposed leading to surgical intervention. Surgical results were satisfying, particularly when looking at delayed healing or long-term tolerance. Esthetic (79% rated results as good or acceptable) and functional results of this reconstruction were satisfying.
CONCLUSION: We conclude by saying that reconstruction plate provides a solution for safe and rapid mandibular reconstruction for patients with poor prognosis or poor condition. This method also preserves the possibility of secondary reconstruction.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The reconstruction plate may be a good clinical choice for safe and rapid mandibular reconstruction.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAttitude to HealthBone PlatesCarcinoma, Squamous CellEquipment FailureEstheticsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMandibleMandibular NeoplasmsMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalOsteotomyPostoperative ComplicationsPlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesSkin TransplantationStainless SteelSurgical FlapsSurgical Wound DehiscenceSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment Outcome