Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2008
Identifying airway obstructions using photoplethysmography (PPG).
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Knorr-Chung Bethany R, McGrath Susan P, Blike George T
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Central and obstructive apneas are sources of morbidity and mortality associated with primary patient conditions as well as secondary to medical care such as sedation/analgesia in post-operative patients. This research investigates the predictive value of the respirophasic variation in the noninvasive photoplethysmography (PPG) waveform signal in detecting airway obstruction.
METHODS: PPG data from 20 consenting healthy adults (12 male, 8 female) undergoing anesthesia were collected directly after surgery and before transfer to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Features of the PPG waveform were calculated and used in a neural network to classify normal and obstructive events.
RESULTS: During the postoperative period studied, the neural network classifier yielded an average (+/-standard deviation) 75.4 (+/-3.7)% sensitivity, 91.6 (+/-2.3)% specificity, 84.7 (+/-3.5)% positive predictive value, 85.9 (+/-1.8)% negative predictive value, and an overall accuracy of 85.4 (+/-2.0)%.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of this method shows promise for use in real-time monitoring situations.
METHODS: PPG data from 20 consenting healthy adults (12 male, 8 female) undergoing anesthesia were collected directly after surgery and before transfer to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Features of the PPG waveform were calculated and used in a neural network to classify normal and obstructive events.
RESULTS: During the postoperative period studied, the neural network classifier yielded an average (+/-standard deviation) 75.4 (+/-3.7)% sensitivity, 91.6 (+/-2.3)% specificity, 84.7 (+/-3.5)% positive predictive value, 85.9 (+/-1.8)% negative predictive value, and an overall accuracy of 85.4 (+/-2.0)%.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of this method shows promise for use in real-time monitoring situations.