Tramadol wound infiltration is not different from intravenous tramadol in children: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this trial was to assess if tramadol wound infiltration is superior to intravenous (IV) tramadol after minor surgical procedures in children because tramadol seems to have local anesthetic-like effect.

DESIGN

Randomized double-blind controlled trial.

SETTING

Postanesthesia care unit.

PATIENTS: Forty children, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, scheduled to elective inguinal hernia repair.

INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly distributed in 1 of 2 groups: IV tramadol (group 1) or subcutaneous infiltration with tramadol (group 2). At the end of the surgery, group 1 received 2 mg/kg tramadol (3 mL) by IV route and 3-mL saline into the surgical wound; group 2 received 2 mg/kg tramadol (3 mL) into the surgical wound and 3-mL saline by IV route.

MEASUREMENTS: In the postanesthesia care unit, patients were evaluated for pain intensity, nausea and vomiting, time to first rescue medication, and total rescue morphine and dipyrone consumption.

MAIN

RESULTS

Pain scores measured during the postanesthesia recovery time were similar between groups. Time to first rescue medication was shorter, but not statistically significant in the IV group. The total dose of rescue morphine and dipyrone was also similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that tramadol was effective in reducing postoperative pain in children, and there was no difference in pain intensity, nausea and vomiting, or somnolence regarding IV route or wound infiltration.