MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf03011591

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 1994

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and mivacurium: a safe alternative to succinylcholine?

Kelly D, Brull S J

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) and malignant hyperthermia (MH) may have a common pathogenic mechanism; therefore, it has been suggested that known triggering agents for MH (such as succinylcholine) should be avoided in patients with NMS. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) continues to play a major therapeutic role in contemporary psychiatry, and succinylcholine has been the muscle relaxant of choice in attenuating violent muscle contractions induced by ECT. Mivacurium is a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant with a relatively rapid onset and a short duration of action, and to date it has been proved safe in MH-susceptible patients. In this case report, following succinylcholine use during ECT, a patient with NMS developed an increase in temperature and serum creatine kinase (CK) level, possibly due to an MH reaction. Since the patient's mental status necessitated further ECT, mivacurium was administered during subsequent treatment and resulted in effective attenuation of muscle contractions without elevation of patient temperature or CK levels. In addition, there was no marked prolongation of the anaesthetic. Mivacurium is a suitable agent for patients with NMS undergoing ECT, as it has not been associated with precipitation of an MH response.

Для цитирования: Kelly D, Brull S J. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and mivacurium: a safe alternative to succinylcholine?. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 1994. DOI: 10.1007/bf03011591.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.