Neurourology and urodynamics · 2011
Clinical and urodynamic effect of methylphenidate for the treatment of giggle incontinence (enuresis risoria).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Joo-Hyun, Lee Kwang-Yeom, Kim Tae-Beom, Yoon Sang-Jin, Lee Tack, Kim Khae-Hawn
Аннотация
AIMS: We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of methylphenidate (MPH) in giggle incontinence (GI), and the relationship between GI and urodynamic parameters.
METHODS: Nine (n = 9) female GI patients underwent 1 year of treatment with 5 mg MPH. Three questionnaires, voiding diaries, and UDS were conducted before and after treatment. The severity of GI was classified into mild, moderate, and severe. Clinical success was characterized as: full response, response, partial response, and non-response.
RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 16.2 ± 2.3 years. Five patients had mild, one had moderate, and three had severe grade incontinent. All patients reported complete cessation of wetting after MPH treatment. The mean duration of asymptomatic period was 7 ± 3.2 months. There were no statistically significant score changes in all three questionnaires: Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and Primary Overactive Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ), and voiding diaries (P > 0.05). In UDS, there were no statistically significant altered parameters, except maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and maximum urethral pressure (MUP). After treatment, the mean MUCP was increased from 52.2 ± 6.8 to 73.0 ± 5.4 cmH(2) O (P < 0.05), and the mean MUP was increased from 48.6 ± 7.3 to 70.2 ± 5.0 cmH(2) O (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: MPH can be a viable option for the primary treatment of GI, and it may be related to increasing urethral closure pressure. It was not possible to establish if a relationship between GI and detrusor overactivity exists.
METHODS: Nine (n = 9) female GI patients underwent 1 year of treatment with 5 mg MPH. Three questionnaires, voiding diaries, and UDS were conducted before and after treatment. The severity of GI was classified into mild, moderate, and severe. Clinical success was characterized as: full response, response, partial response, and non-response.
RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 16.2 ± 2.3 years. Five patients had mild, one had moderate, and three had severe grade incontinent. All patients reported complete cessation of wetting after MPH treatment. The mean duration of asymptomatic period was 7 ± 3.2 months. There were no statistically significant score changes in all three questionnaires: Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and Primary Overactive Symptom Questionnaire (POSQ), and voiding diaries (P > 0.05). In UDS, there were no statistically significant altered parameters, except maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and maximum urethral pressure (MUP). After treatment, the mean MUCP was increased from 52.2 ± 6.8 to 73.0 ± 5.4 cmH(2) O (P < 0.05), and the mean MUP was increased from 48.6 ± 7.3 to 70.2 ± 5.0 cmH(2) O (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: MPH can be a viable option for the primary treatment of GI, and it may be related to increasing urethral closure pressure. It was not possible to establish if a relationship between GI and detrusor overactivity exists.