American journal of surgery · 2011
Predictors of relaparotomy after nontrauma emergency general surgery with initial fascial closure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Jerry J, Liang Mike K, Subramanian Anuradha, Balentine Courtney J, Sansgiry Shubhada, Awad Samir S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Relaparotomy after emergency surgery for nontrauma intraabdominal catastrophes (NTIAC) is morbid. Our objective was to identify patients who likely will need on-demand relaparotomy after surgery for NTIAC.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients from 1998 to 2008 identified cases of NTIAC surgery with fascial closure. Demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative findings, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Relaparotomy was defined as any return to the operating room with surgical re-entry of the abdominal cavity.
RESULTS: A total of 129 patients underwent NTIAC surgery with fascial closure. Twenty-nine patients (22%) required relaparotomy and 100 patients (78%) did not. Multivariate analysis identified the following predictors of relaparotomy: peripheral vascular disease (P = .04), alcohol abuse (P = .02), body mass index of 29 kg/m(2) or greater (P = .04), the finding of any ischemic bowel (P = .02), and operating room latency of 60 hours or longer (P = .01). Patients with 2 or more of these predictors had a 55% risk of relaparotomy whereas patients with fewer than 2 of these predictors had a 9% risk (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients whose fascia is closed during NTIAC surgery do worse when they require relaparotomy. We have identified preoperative and intraoperative predictors that may help identify patients at high risk of on-demand relaparotomy.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients from 1998 to 2008 identified cases of NTIAC surgery with fascial closure. Demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative findings, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Relaparotomy was defined as any return to the operating room with surgical re-entry of the abdominal cavity.
RESULTS: A total of 129 patients underwent NTIAC surgery with fascial closure. Twenty-nine patients (22%) required relaparotomy and 100 patients (78%) did not. Multivariate analysis identified the following predictors of relaparotomy: peripheral vascular disease (P = .04), alcohol abuse (P = .02), body mass index of 29 kg/m(2) or greater (P = .04), the finding of any ischemic bowel (P = .02), and operating room latency of 60 hours or longer (P = .01). Patients with 2 or more of these predictors had a 55% risk of relaparotomy whereas patients with fewer than 2 of these predictors had a 9% risk (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients whose fascia is closed during NTIAC surgery do worse when they require relaparotomy. We have identified preoperative and intraoperative predictors that may help identify patients at high risk of on-demand relaparotomy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Abdominal CavityAbscessAlcoholismAnastomotic LeakBody Mass IndexEmergenciesFasciotomyFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntestinesIschemiaLaparotomyLength of StayLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOperating RoomsPeripheral Vascular DiseasesPostoperative HemorrhageReoperationRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound DehiscenceTime Factors