MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2406674

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2025

Abelacimab versus Rivaroxaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Ruff Christian T, Patel Siddharth M, Giugliano Robert P, Morrow David A, Hug Bruce, Kuder Julia F, Goodrich Erica L, Chen Shih-Ann, Goodman Shaun G, Joung Boyoung, Kiss Robert G, Spinar Jindrich, Wojakowski Wojciech, Weitz Jeffrey I, Murphy Sabina A, Wiviott Stephen D, Parkar Sanobar, Bloomfield Daniel, Sabatine Marc S, AZALEA–TIMI 71 Investigators

Клиническое исследование II фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Abelacimab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to the inactive form of factor XI and blocks its activation. The safety of abelacimab as compared with a direct oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation is unknown.

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation and a moderate-to-high risk of stroke were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive subcutaneous injection of abelacimab (150 mg or 90 mg once monthly) administered in a blinded fashion or oral rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) administered in an open-label fashion. The primary end point was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 1287 patients underwent randomization; the median age was 74 years, and 44% were women. At 3 months, the median reduction in free factor XI levels with abelacimab at a dose of 150 mg was 99% (interquartile range, 98 to 99) and with abelacimab at a dose of 90 mg was 97% (interquartile range, 51 to 99). The trial was stopped early on the recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee because of a greater-than-anticipated reduction in bleeding events with abelacimab. The incidence rate of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 3.2 events per 100 person-years with 150-mg abelacimab and 2.6 events per 100 person-years with 90-mg abelacimab, as compared with 8.4 events per 100 person-years with rivaroxaban (hazard ratio for 150-mg abelacimab vs. rivaroxaban, 0.38 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.24 to 0.60]; hazard ratio for 90-mg abelacimab vs. rivaroxaban, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.51]; P<0.001 for both comparisons). The incidence and severity of adverse events appeared to be similar in the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with atrial fibrillation who were at moderate-to-high risk for stroke, treatment with abelacimab resulted in markedly lower levels of free factor XI and fewer bleeding events than treatment with rivaroxaban. (Funded by Anthos Therapeutics; AZALEA-TIMI 71 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04755283.).

Для цитирования: Ruff Christian T, Patel Siddharth M, Giugliano Robert P, Morrow David A, Hug Bruce, Kuder Julia F, Goodrich Erica L, Chen Shih-Ann, Goodman Shaun G, Joung Boyoung, Kiss Robert G, Spinar Jindrich, Wojakowski Wojciech, Weitz Jeffrey I, Murphy Sabina A, Wiviott Stephen D, Parkar Sanobar, Bloomfield Daniel, Sabatine Marc S, AZALEA–TIMI 71 Investigators. Abelacimab versus Rivaroxaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.. The New England journal of medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2406674.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.