The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland · 2009
Is intravenous urography necessary in the assessment of renal duplex system in children?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Antao B, Agarwal S, Ng J, Rodrigues B, Broadley P, Roberts J, Mackinnon A E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Partial or complete duplication of the renal tract may be an incidental finding or may be associated with significant pathology. Accurate assessment is not always easy. This retrospective review was undertaken to determine whether intravenous urography (IVU) in combination with a DMSA renal scan provides significant additional information.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients referred to our imaging department with a provisional diagnosis on ultrasound of renal tract duplication during a three year period were identified by searching the radiological computer files. The presenting features were urinary infection (13), abdominal pain (3) and abnormal antenatal sonography (2).
RESULTS: Four patients were found not to have renal duplication. There was concordance between the IVU and DMSA scan in seven. Additional clinically relevant information was obtained in three cases. A false negative result from the DMSA scan was found in four children and a false positive result in three.
CONCLUSION: In a significant number of cases of possible renal tract duplication, additional relevant information can be obtained from an IVU. Patient distress is minimised by combining the IVU and DMSA in one single episode of venous access. Review of the radiological images during the investigation allows minimisation of radiation dosage.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients referred to our imaging department with a provisional diagnosis on ultrasound of renal tract duplication during a three year period were identified by searching the radiological computer files. The presenting features were urinary infection (13), abdominal pain (3) and abnormal antenatal sonography (2).
RESULTS: Four patients were found not to have renal duplication. There was concordance between the IVU and DMSA scan in seven. Additional clinically relevant information was obtained in three cases. A false negative result from the DMSA scan was found in four children and a false positive result in three.
CONCLUSION: In a significant number of cases of possible renal tract duplication, additional relevant information can be obtained from an IVU. Patient distress is minimised by combining the IVU and DMSA in one single episode of venous access. Review of the radiological images during the investigation allows minimisation of radiation dosage.