MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0886260518772110

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of interpersonal violence · 2018

Comparing Women's and Men's Sexual Offending Using a Statewide Incarcerated Sample: A Two-Study Design.

Comartin Erin B, Burgess-Proctor Amanda, Kubiak Sheryl, Bender Kimberly A, Kernsmith Poco

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study identifies the characteristics that distinguish between women's and men's sexual offending. We compare women and men currently incarcerated for a sex offense in one state using two data sources: administrative data on sex offenders in the state prison (N = 9,235) and subsample surveys (n = 129). Bivariate and logistic regressions were used in these analyses. Women account for a small proportion (1.1%, N = 98) of incarcerated sex offenders. In the population, women and men were convicted of similar types of sex offenses. The subsample was demographically similar to the population. In the subsample, women were more likely than men to have a child victim, be the parent/guardian of the victim, have a co-offender, and repeatedly perpetrate against the same victim. Findings suggest that women convicted and sentenced for a sex offense differ from their male counterparts, with predictive factors being dependent upon the age of their victim(s). Sex offender treatment interventions developed for men are poorly suited to and may have limited efficacy for women.

Для цитирования: Comartin Erin B, Burgess-Proctor Amanda, Kubiak Sheryl, Bender Kimberly A, Kernsmith Poco. Comparing Women's and Men's Sexual Offending Using a Statewide Incarcerated Sample: A Two-Study Design.. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0886260518772110.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.