Saudi medical journal · 2005
Validity of leukocyte count to predict the severity of acute appendicitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guraya Salman Y, Al-Tuwaijri Talal A, Khairy Gamal A, Murshid Khalid R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether white blood cell (WBC) count with differential analysis may predict severity of disease in acute appendicitis.
METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study on appendectomy patients from 1996 to 2001, at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We reviewed patient's age, gender, duration of symptoms, temperature on admission, WBC count including differential and the histological diagnosis of the appendicular specimen. We further analyzed the data of those patients found to have acute, gangrenous and perforated appendicitis to determine the correlation between a high WBC count and a more advanced form of appendicitis.
RESULTS: Out of an aggregate of 232 patients, 162 were males and 70 females with a mean age of 23.7 years (range, 12-70 years). Mean duration of symptoms was 1.9 +/- 1.1 days, mean temperature 37.8 +/- 1.4 degrees C, with reported elevated WBC count in 167 (71.9%) and normal in 65 (28.1%) cases. Mean WBC counts in acute were 14.5 +/- 7.3 x 10(9)/L, gangrenous 17.1 +/- 3.9 x 10(9)/L and perforated appendicitis 17.9 +/- 2.1 x 10(9)/L. This reflected a persistently higher WBC count in the complex (gangrenous, perforated) appendicitis compared with acute appendicitis (p < 0.05). The differential analysis showed neutrophilia in 123 (53%) and lymphopenia in 112 (48%) cases and out of these, 116 (94%) with neutrophilia and 107 (95%) with lymphopenia were reported to have appendicitis.
CONCLUSION: A high WBC with differential count is a reliable indicator of the severity of appendicitis and signifies a more advanced stage.
METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study on appendectomy patients from 1996 to 2001, at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We reviewed patient's age, gender, duration of symptoms, temperature on admission, WBC count including differential and the histological diagnosis of the appendicular specimen. We further analyzed the data of those patients found to have acute, gangrenous and perforated appendicitis to determine the correlation between a high WBC count and a more advanced form of appendicitis.
RESULTS: Out of an aggregate of 232 patients, 162 were males and 70 females with a mean age of 23.7 years (range, 12-70 years). Mean duration of symptoms was 1.9 +/- 1.1 days, mean temperature 37.8 +/- 1.4 degrees C, with reported elevated WBC count in 167 (71.9%) and normal in 65 (28.1%) cases. Mean WBC counts in acute were 14.5 +/- 7.3 x 10(9)/L, gangrenous 17.1 +/- 3.9 x 10(9)/L and perforated appendicitis 17.9 +/- 2.1 x 10(9)/L. This reflected a persistently higher WBC count in the complex (gangrenous, perforated) appendicitis compared with acute appendicitis (p < 0.05). The differential analysis showed neutrophilia in 123 (53%) and lymphopenia in 112 (48%) cases and out of these, 116 (94%) with neutrophilia and 107 (95%) with lymphopenia were reported to have appendicitis.
CONCLUSION: A high WBC with differential count is a reliable indicator of the severity of appendicitis and signifies a more advanced stage.