MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric dentistry · 2012

Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome in 2 siblings: case report after 11-year follow-up.

Pimentel Suzana Peres, Kolbe Maria Fernanda, Pereira Roberta Sevá, Ribeiro Fernanda Vieira, Cirano Fabiano Ribeiro, Casati Márcio Zaffalon, Casarin Renato Corrêa Viana

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this case report was to describe the clinical long-term outcome, 11 years after periodontal therapy, of 2 siblings diagnosed with Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome. Sibling 1 was a 14-year-old boy with severe periodontal bone loss in his permanent dentition. Sibling 2 was a 7-year-old girl with mixed-dentition and also suffering from periodontal disease. Both were treated with a combination of nonsurgical and antimicrobial therapy. Annual re-evaluations were performed for 11 years. Both siblings improved their periodontal status, but a low level of compliance with treatment over time by sibling 1 resulted in further tooth loss and recurrent periodontal disease. Sibling 2 experienced good periodontal healing in her primary and, later, permanent teeth due in part to proper compliance with oral hygiene instructions. Periodontal health was achieved, and no tooth loss occurred during follow-up. Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome subjects can be successfully treated with nonsurgical/antimicrobial therapy, but treatment outcome could be related to age at diagnosis and compliance with oral hygiene procedures.

Для цитирования: Pimentel Suzana Peres, Kolbe Maria Fernanda, Pereira Roberta Sevá, Ribeiro Fernanda Vieira, Cirano Fabiano Ribeiro, Casati Márcio Zaffalon, Casarin Renato Corrêa Viana. Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome in 2 siblings: case report after 11-year follow-up.. Pediatric dentistry. 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.