Journal of intensive care medicine · 2009
Children with respiratory distress treated with high-flow nasal cannula.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Spentzas Thomas, Minarik Milan, Patters Andrea B, Vinson Brett, Stidham Greg
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is a treatment for respiratory distress in neonates and children. In the present study, we assessed its effectiveness, comfort, and possible mechanism of action.
METHODS: We reviewed records of 46 patients treated with HFNC and estimated the modified COMFORT score (7 to 35 units), the respiratory clinical scale (0 to 12 units), and the oxygen saturation level. Data were collected at time 0 (before the use of high-flow), time 2 (60 to 90 min post-application), and at time 3 (8 to 12 hours post-application). Furthermore, we measured the nasopharyngeal pressure while on continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) as well as the differences in ''lung expansion'' demonstrated by the prestudy and post-study chest x-ray.
RESULTS: There were significant improvements in the modified COMFORT score (F(1,45) = 40.03, P < .05), respiratory clinical scale (F(1.69,76.15) = 121.19, P < .05), and oxygen saturation (F(2,90) = 101.54, P < .05). Application of HFNC therapy created a significant average positive expiratory pressure of 4.0 +/- 1.99 (SE) cm H(2)O. X-rays taken after initiation of HFNC showed either improved aeration of the lungs or no changes in 40 of 46 patients. Mechanical ventilation was needed in 5 of 46 patients.
CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that high-flow nasal cannula improves the respiratory scale score, the oxygen saturation, and the patient's COMFORT scale. Its mechanism of action is application of mild positive airway pressure and lung volume recruitment.
METHODS: We reviewed records of 46 patients treated with HFNC and estimated the modified COMFORT score (7 to 35 units), the respiratory clinical scale (0 to 12 units), and the oxygen saturation level. Data were collected at time 0 (before the use of high-flow), time 2 (60 to 90 min post-application), and at time 3 (8 to 12 hours post-application). Furthermore, we measured the nasopharyngeal pressure while on continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) as well as the differences in ''lung expansion'' demonstrated by the prestudy and post-study chest x-ray.
RESULTS: There were significant improvements in the modified COMFORT score (F(1,45) = 40.03, P < .05), respiratory clinical scale (F(1.69,76.15) = 121.19, P < .05), and oxygen saturation (F(2,90) = 101.54, P < .05). Application of HFNC therapy created a significant average positive expiratory pressure of 4.0 +/- 1.99 (SE) cm H(2)O. X-rays taken after initiation of HFNC showed either improved aeration of the lungs or no changes in 40 of 46 patients. Mechanical ventilation was needed in 5 of 46 patients.
CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that high-flow nasal cannula improves the respiratory scale score, the oxygen saturation, and the patient's COMFORT scale. Its mechanism of action is application of mild positive airway pressure and lung volume recruitment.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age FactorsCatheterizationChildChild, PreschoolContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNasal CavityOxygen ConsumptionPeak Expiratory Flow RatePsychometricsRegression AnalysisRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory InsufficiencyRespiratory MechanicsRetrospective Studies