MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric dentistry · 2021

A Retrospective Evaluation of the Safety Profile of Dexmedetomidine and Nitrous Oxide for Pediatric Dental Sedation.

Unkel John H, Cruise Carson, Rice Adam, Macdonald Jennifer, Berry Elizabeth J, Reinhartz Judy, Reinhartz Dennis

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety of three different sedation regimens for pediatric dental procedures to examine the safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine paired with nitrous oxide (N₂O).

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of 149 three-to six-year-old healthy patients who underwent sedation to complete dental treatment. Forty-nine patients received intranasal dexmedetomidine with nitrous oxide (DEXNO), 47 received oral midazolam with nitrous oxide (MIDNO), and 53 received oral midazolam and oral hydroxyzine with nitrous oxide (MIDHYXNO). Demographic data, procedural times, vital signs, and adverse events were recorded.

Results

No patients in any of the three groups experienced major adverse events. All groups experienced some degree of hypotension. One of the 49 DEXNO cases experienced bradycardia intraoperatively. No cases required clinical intervention.

Conclusion

This pilot study suggested that intranasal dexmedetomidine with nitrous oxide is a safe sedation regimen for pediatric procedures, comparable to combinations of oral midazolam with nitrous oxide and oral midazolam and oral hydroxyzine with nitrous oxide.

Для цитирования: Unkel John H, Cruise Carson, Rice Adam, Macdonald Jennifer, Berry Elizabeth J, Reinhartz Judy, Reinhartz Dennis. A Retrospective Evaluation of the Safety Profile of Dexmedetomidine and Nitrous Oxide for Pediatric Dental Sedation.. Pediatric dentistry. 2021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.