Can We Eliminate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Related Cardiovascular Events Through More Aggressive Primary Prevention Therapy?

Intravascular levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at approximately ≤ 0.6 mmol/L are likely to minimize, and perhaps eliminate, LDL-C-related vascular toxicity while having no effect on essential, intracellular cholesterol homeostatic pathways, according to accumulated knowledge from basic science. Randomized clinical trials, observational reports, and Mendelian randomization trials are also forcing a reconsideration of what "normal" LDL-C means. Recent trials of secondary prevention have substantiated that such levels are safe and associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) compared with patients with higher levels of LDL-C. Similarly, treatment to this low range is associated with regression and stabilization of established atherosclerosis. Primary prevention trials also show that low levels of LDL-C are safe and associated with decreased risk of CVEs through cholesterol-lowering in adults with LDL-C ≥ 3.5 mmol/L or when levels are < 3.5 mmol/L in association with other cardiovascular risks. Although there are no randomized clinical outcome trials of familial hypercholesterolemia patients, such patients have very high, lifetime risk of CVE, and registry studies show that LDL-C reduction has nearly normalized their CVE rates. The possibility of familial hypercholesterolemia should be considered if LDL-C is > 4.5 and > 4.0 mmol/L at ages 18-39 years and younger than 18 years, respectively. On the basis of these convergent and internally consistent lines of evidence, in this article we speculate on a translational paradigm aimed at eliminating LDL-C-related CVEs through aggressive primary prevention strategies that are already proven and well accepted in principle.