Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique · 2021
Impact of field number and beam angle on ERE for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with 1.5T MR-Linac.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ding S, Liu H, Wang B, Li Y, Li R, Liu B, Xia Y, Huang X
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of field number and beam angle on ERE during IMRT planning with 1.5T MR-Linac for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: IMRT plans for three representative lung cases who treated with 1.5T MR-Linac were generated using TPS Monaco 5.40.01. In each case, five types of plans were generated: (1) the "original plan" generated using 5-fields and beam angles manually optimized in ipsilateral tumor side, with no transverse magnetic field (TMF); (2) the plans generated by reoptimizing and recalculating the original plan, with a 1.5T TMF; (3) the plans generated with 5-fields, with beam angles manually optimized in anterior-posterior (AP) direction; (4) the plans generated with equidistant 5-fields; and (5) the plans generated with equidistant 9-fields. These plans were compared using a variety of dose-volume-parameters (DVPs).
RESULTS: The DVPs under TMF showed the presence of 1.5T TMF can slightly change for all lung cases studied. When the plans generated with beam angles manually optimized in anterior-posterior direction, results showed that the plans improved conformity and homogeneity for PTV and reduced the dose to tissue surface. Furthermore, the results showed that the equidistant/non-equidistant comparison of the previous target anatomy result in a more favourable dose distribution for the equidistant beam setting. At last, the results showed the dose distributions for PTV with 9 and 5 equidistant beams were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: The plan quality can be significantly changed by the presence of a 1.5T TMF for lung SBRT with MR-Linac. The selection of optimal fields number and beam angle can substantially reduce or even eliminate these changes, without deteriorating overall plan quality.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: IMRT plans for three representative lung cases who treated with 1.5T MR-Linac were generated using TPS Monaco 5.40.01. In each case, five types of plans were generated: (1) the "original plan" generated using 5-fields and beam angles manually optimized in ipsilateral tumor side, with no transverse magnetic field (TMF); (2) the plans generated by reoptimizing and recalculating the original plan, with a 1.5T TMF; (3) the plans generated with 5-fields, with beam angles manually optimized in anterior-posterior (AP) direction; (4) the plans generated with equidistant 5-fields; and (5) the plans generated with equidistant 9-fields. These plans were compared using a variety of dose-volume-parameters (DVPs).
RESULTS: The DVPs under TMF showed the presence of 1.5T TMF can slightly change for all lung cases studied. When the plans generated with beam angles manually optimized in anterior-posterior direction, results showed that the plans improved conformity and homogeneity for PTV and reduced the dose to tissue surface. Furthermore, the results showed that the equidistant/non-equidistant comparison of the previous target anatomy result in a more favourable dose distribution for the equidistant beam setting. At last, the results showed the dose distributions for PTV with 9 and 5 equidistant beams were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: The plan quality can be significantly changed by the presence of a 1.5T TMF for lung SBRT with MR-Linac. The selection of optimal fields number and beam angle can substantially reduce or even eliminate these changes, without deteriorating overall plan quality.