MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00198-019-04904-z

Медицинская библиотека · Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019

Appendicular lean mass and fracture risk assessment: implications for FRAX® and sarcopenia.

Harvey N C, Kanis J A, Liu E, Johansson H, Lorentzon M, McCloskey E

Редакционная статьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The vast majority of current sarcopenia definitions use DXA-derived appendicular lean mass (DXA ALM) as an approximation of muscle mass. However, there is increasing evidence that ALM is poorly predictive of incident fractures. In this editorial, we describe findings from several cohorts suggesting that DXA ALM gives only limited information on the risk of incident fracture, and that in the US MrOS, WHI and Health ABC cohorts, accounting for femoral neck bone mineral density may entirely remove ALM-fracture associations. These observations raise important questions about the role of DXA ALM both in sarcopenia definitions and as a potential input variable for FRAX. We conclude that DXA ALM is unlikely to be a useful addition to the FRAX tool, but that other means of estimating muscle mass, such as those derived from creatine dilution or peripheral quantitative CT, might offer more value for fracture risk assessment.

Для цитирования: Harvey N C, Kanis J A, Liu E, Johansson H, Lorentzon M, McCloskey E. Appendicular lean mass and fracture risk assessment: implications for FRAX® and sarcopenia.. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-04904-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.