MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1079063218759323

Медицинская библиотека · Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment · 2018

The Prevalence of Sexual Abuse in Institutions: Results From a Representative Population-Based Sample in Germany.

Witt Andreas, Rassenhofer Miriam, Allroggen Marc, Brähler Elmar, Plener Paul L, Fegert Jörg M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The lifetime prevalence of sexual abuse in institutional settings in Germany was examined in a sample representative of the general adult population (N = 2,437). Participants completed a survey on whether they had ever experienced such abuse, its nature (contact, noncontact, forced sexual, intercourse), the type of institution (e.g. school, club), and the relationship of perpetrator to victim (peer, caregiver, staff member). Overall, 3.1% of adult respondents (women: 4.8%, men: 0.8%) reported having experienced some type of sexual abuse in institutions. Adult women reported higher rates of all types than did men, with rates of 3.9% versus 0.8% for contact sexual abuse, 1.2% versus 0.3% for noncontact sexual abuse, and 1.7% versus 0.2% for forced sexual intercourse. We conclude that a remarkable proportion of the general population experiences sexual abuse in institutions, underscoring the need for development of protective strategies. Especially, schools seem to represent good starting points for primary prevention strategies.

Для цитирования: Witt Andreas, Rassenhofer Miriam, Allroggen Marc, Brähler Elmar, Plener Paul L, Fegert Jörg M. The Prevalence of Sexual Abuse in Institutions: Results From a Representative Population-Based Sample in Germany.. Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1079063218759323.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.