MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12883-022-02608-2

Медицинская библиотека · BMC neurology · 2022

Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children.

Tokumoto Shoichi, Nishiyama Masahiro, Yamaguchi Hiroshi, Tomioka Kazumi, Ishida Yusuke, Toyoshima Daisaku, Kurosawa Hiroshi, Nozu Kandai, Maruyama Azusa, Tanaka Ryojiro, Iijima Kazumoto, Nagase Hiroaki

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Febrile status epilepticus is the most common form of status epilepticus in children. No previous reports compare the effectiveness of treatment strategies using fosphenytoin (fPHT) or phenobarbital (PB) and those using anesthetics as second-line anti-seizure medication for benzodiazepine-resistant convulsive status epilepticus (CSE). We aimed to examine the outcomes of various treatment strategies for febrile convulsive status epilepticus (FCSE) in a real-world setting while comparing the effects of different treatment protocols and their presence or absence.

METHODS

This was a single-center historical cohort study that was divided into three periods. Patients who presented with febrile convulsive status epilepticus for ≥60 min even after the administration of at least one anticonvulsant were included. During period I (October 2002-December 2006), treatment was performed at the discretion of the attending physician, without a protocol. During period II (January 2007-February 2013), barbiturate coma therapy (BCT) was indicated for FCSE resistant to benzodiazepines. During period III (March 2013-April 2016), BCT was indicated for FCSE resistant to fPHT or PB.

RESULTS

The rate of electroencephalogram monitoring was lower in period I than period II+III (11.5% vs. 85.7%, p<0.01). Midazolam was administered by continuous infusion more often in period I than period II+III (84.6% vs. 25.0%, p<0.01), whereas fPHT was administered less often in period I than period II+III (0% vs. 27.4%, p<0.01). The rate of poor outcome, which was determined using the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale, was higher in period I than period II+III (23.1% vs. 7.1%, p=0.03). The rate of poor outcome did not differ between periods II and III (4.2% vs. 11.1%, p=0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

While the presence of a treatment protocol for FCSE in children may improve outcomes, a treatment protocol using fPHT or PB may not be associated with better outcomes.

Для цитирования: Tokumoto Shoichi, Nishiyama Masahiro, Yamaguchi Hiroshi, Tomioka Kazumi, Ishida Yusuke, Toyoshima Daisaku, Kurosawa Hiroshi, Nozu Kandai, Maruyama Azusa, Tanaka Ryojiro, Iijima Kazumoto, Nagase Hiroaki. Prognostic effects of treatment protocols for febrile convulsive status epilepticus in children.. BMC neurology. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02608-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.