MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.08.003

Медицинская библиотека · Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2012

Management and outcome of condylar fractures in children and adolescents: a review of the literature.

Bruckmoser Emanuel, Undt Gerhard

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of all kinds of case reports and clinical studies focusing on management and outcome of mandibular condylar fractures (CFs) in children and adolescents.

STUDY

DESIGN

A PubMed search of the international literature was done, completed by an additional hand search based on the available references of the publications found.

RESULTS

In total, 73 articles were included in this review: 7 case reports and 2 retrospective clinical studies regarding surgical management, 1 publication with case reports, 1 prospective and 3 retrospective clinical studies comparing operative and conservative treatment, 20 publications with case reports, and 35 retrospective and 4 prospective clinical studies dealing with conservative management of CFs in children and adolescents.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite frequently encountered radiologic abnormalities, conservative management of CFs in children usually yields satisfactory to excellent clinical results. However, in adolescents the outcome is often reported to be less favorable. Good prospective randomized multicenter studies would clarify from which age on patients could probably benefit from operative treatment.

Для цитирования: Bruckmoser Emanuel, Undt Gerhard. Management and outcome of condylar fractures in children and adolescents: a review of the literature.. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.08.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.