DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.12.017
Incidence and pattern of maxillofacial fractures in children and adolescents: a 10 years retrospective cohort study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the demographic characteristics of maxillofacial fractures between children and adolescents.
METHODS
The sample was composed of all children (less than 12 years) and adolescents (between 13 and 18 years old) who presented with maxillofacial fractures during a 10-year period (2000-2009). The age, gender, time of injury, mechanism of trauma, location and pattern of fracture, associated injuries, and treatment methods were recorded and analyzed. Data analysis included Chi-Square test, Fisher exact test. p less than 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Seventy-nine children (male-to-female ratio, 1.63:1) and 113 adolescents (male-to-female ratio, 3.52:1) sustained 389 maxillofacial fractures. Children were more involved in falls compared to adolescents (44.3% versus 23.9%, p=0.003), while adolescents sustained more assault-related injuries (13.3% versus 2.5%, p=0.010) and motorcycle accidents (22.1% versus 8.9%, p=0.015) compared to children. Children suffered mandibular fractures proportionally higher than adolescents (93.1% versus 64.5%, p<0.001). Adolescents sustained mid-facial fractures more frequently than children (35.5% versus 6.9%, p<0.001). Severe facial fractures occurred more in adolescents compared to children (35.4% versus 14.1%, p=0.001). Open reduction was done more in adolescents than in children (92.3% versus 74.6%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence and pattern of maxillofacial fractures in children were remarkably different from that in adolescents. Preventive measures and treatment plan should be designed with differences between the two groups in mind.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.