Urology · 2014
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic upper pole heminephroureterectomy for children with duplex kidney: a retrospective comparative study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Huixia, Ming Shaoxiong, Ma Lifei, Wang Chao, Liu Xin, Zhou Xiaoguang, Xie Huawei, Tao Tian, Ma Sichao, Cheng Wei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To present our experience regarding transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy (SILH) in children with duplex kidney anomalies, and to investigate its feasibility and safety compared with those of conventional laparoscopic heminephroureterectomy (CLH).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A matched-pair study comparing 34 SILHs and 34 CLHs performed by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2013 was presented. All SILHs were performed through a 2-cm periumbilical incision by using the port-access system, whereas CLH cases were performed via a transperitoneal 3-port approach. The groups were matched for age, gender, weight, laterality, and surgical indication of the patients. Data including demographics and perioperative and short-term outcomes of the patients were retrospectively compared.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable in demographics, and surgical indications of the patients (P >.05). No significant difference was observed between SILH and CLH cases in terms of median operative time (105 vs 97 minutes; P = .06), estimated blood loss (22 vs 25 mL; P = .91), interval for oral intake (12 vs 12 hours; P = .69), analgesic requirement (9 vs 6 cases; P = .38), transfusion rate (0% for both; P = 1.00), complication rate (2.9% vs 0%; P = 1.00), postoperative hospital stay (5.0 vs 4.5 days; P = .59), and renal functional loss of the operated side at 3 months after surgery (5.4% vs 5.2%; P = .60).
CONCLUSION: SILH is feasible and safe in the hands of an experienced pediatric laparoscopic surgeon. Although the outcomes were comparable, better subjective cosmetic results of SILH were achieved.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A matched-pair study comparing 34 SILHs and 34 CLHs performed by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2013 was presented. All SILHs were performed through a 2-cm periumbilical incision by using the port-access system, whereas CLH cases were performed via a transperitoneal 3-port approach. The groups were matched for age, gender, weight, laterality, and surgical indication of the patients. Data including demographics and perioperative and short-term outcomes of the patients were retrospectively compared.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable in demographics, and surgical indications of the patients (P >.05). No significant difference was observed between SILH and CLH cases in terms of median operative time (105 vs 97 minutes; P = .06), estimated blood loss (22 vs 25 mL; P = .91), interval for oral intake (12 vs 12 hours; P = .69), analgesic requirement (9 vs 6 cases; P = .38), transfusion rate (0% for both; P = 1.00), complication rate (2.9% vs 0%; P = 1.00), postoperative hospital stay (5.0 vs 4.5 days; P = .59), and renal functional loss of the operated side at 3 months after surgery (5.4% vs 5.2%; P = .60).
CONCLUSION: SILH is feasible and safe in the hands of an experienced pediatric laparoscopic surgeon. Although the outcomes were comparable, better subjective cosmetic results of SILH were achieved.