MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/lgt.0b013e31820eae51

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of lower genital tract disease · 2011

Multiple glomangiomas involving the glans penis in pediatric patient.

Szumilo Justyna, Fronczek Agnieszka, Lewkowicz Dorota, Osemlak Pawel

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Glomus tumors, especially multiple ones, are uncommon skin and soft tissue neoplasms occasionally seen in various internal organs. Involvement of the external genital organs including penis is extremely rare, and until now, scarce cases have been reported in the available literature.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A routine histologic and immunohistochemical staining for pan-muscle actin, α-smooth muscle actin, desmin, CD31, and CD34 was applied for diagnosis of the lesions.

RESULTS

Three soft, bluish, and tender tumors localized on the ventral aspect of the glans penis in a 9-year-old boy were found. Furthermore, 3 other lesions situated on the fingers and the plantar surface of the foot were later sequentially noted. Local excisions of all tumors were performed, and glomangiomas were diagnosed based on typical microscopic features as well as immunohistochemical findings, that is, positive immunoexpression for actin but negative for desmin, CD31, and CD34. No recurrence was noted during the 5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our experience, conservative surgical procedure is sufficient for penile glomus tumors. However, each patient should be carefully examined for possible extragenital lesions.

Для цитирования: Szumilo Justyna, Fronczek Agnieszka, Lewkowicz Dorota, Osemlak Pawel. Multiple glomangiomas involving the glans penis in pediatric patient.. Journal of lower genital tract disease. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0b013e31820eae51.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.