MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/desc.12102

Медицинская библиотека · Developmental science · 2013

The deficit of letter processing in developmental dyslexia: combining evidence from dyslexics, typical readers and illiterate adults.

Fernandes Tânia, Vale Ana P, Martins Bruno, Morais José, Kolinsky Régine

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To clarify the link between anomalous letter processing and developmental dyslexia, we examined the impact of surrounding contours on letter vs. pseudo-letter processing by three groups of children - phonological dyslexics and two controls, one matched for chronological age, the other for reading level - and three groups of adults differing by schooling and literacy - unschooled illiterates and ex-illiterates, and schooled literates. For pseudo-letters, all groups showed congruence effects (CE: better performance for targets surrounded by a congruent than by an incongruent shape). In contrast, for letters, only dyslexics exhibited a CE, strongly related to their phonological recoding abilities even after partialling out working memory, whereas the reverse held true for the pseudo-letter CE. In illiterate adults, the higher letter knowledge, the smaller their letter CE; their letter processing was immune (to some extent) to inference from surrounding information. The absence of a letter CE in illiterates and the positive CE in dyslexics have their origin in different aspects of the same ability, i.e. phonological recoding.

Для цитирования: Fernandes Tânia, Vale Ana P, Martins Bruno, Morais José, Kolinsky Régine. The deficit of letter processing in developmental dyslexia: combining evidence from dyslexics, typical readers and illiterate adults.. Developmental science. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12102.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.