MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/2000656x.2016.1265529

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery · 2017

Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 7. Occlusion in 5 year-olds according to the Huddart and Bodenham index.

Karsten Agneta, Marcusson Agneta, Hurmerinta Kirsti, Heliövaara Arja, Küseler Annelise, Skaare Pål, Bellardie Haydn, Rønning Elisabeth, Shaw William, Mølsted Kirsten, Sæle Paul, Brinck Eli, Rizell Sara, Najal Chalier Midia, Eyres Philip, Semb Gunvor

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Good dentofacial development and good occlusion are main goals in the treatment of UCLP. The aim was to evaluate dental occlusion at age 5 years with the Huddart and Bodenham index after four different protocols of primary surgery for UCLP.

DESIGN

Three parallel randomised controlled trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by 10 cleft teams in five countries: Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway, and the UK.

METHODS

Three different surgical procedures for primary palatal repair (Arms B, C, and D) were tested against a common procedure (Arm A) in the total cohort of 448 children born with non-syndromic UCLP. Dental casts of 418 patients (272 boys, 146 girls), at the mean age of 5.1 years (range =4.7-6.9) were blindly assessed by 10 orthodontists with the original Huddart and Bodenham index. The main outcome measure was dental occlusion.

RESULTS

The inter- and intra-examiner reliability was good-to-excellent (0.61-0.94; 0.66-1.0, respectively). The mean total scores (+2 to -18) varied from -5.56 (Trial 2C) to -7.21 (Trial 3D). The mean anterior scores (+2 to -6) varied from -1.66 (Trial 2C) to -2.56 (Trial 3A). The mean posterior cleft-side scores (0 to -6) varied from -3.24 (Trial 3A) to -3.82 (Trial 3D) and the mean non-cleft-side scores (0 to -6) varied from -0.60 (Trial 2C) to -1.30 (Trial 3A); however, no significant differences were found within the trials.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistical evidence of a difference in occlusion between the two surgical methods in each trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29932826.

Для цитирования: Karsten Agneta, Marcusson Agneta, Hurmerinta Kirsti, Heliövaara Arja, Küseler Annelise, Skaare Pål, Bellardie Haydn, Rønning Elisabeth, Shaw William, Mølsted Kirsten, Sæle Paul, Brinck Eli, Rizell Sara, Najal Chalier Midia, Eyres Philip, Semb Gunvor. Scandcleft randomised trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: 7. Occlusion in 5 year-olds according to the Huddart and Bodenham index.. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2016.1265529.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.