MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0009922814549314

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical pediatrics · 2014

Curiosity and critical thinking: identifying child abuse before it is too late.

Jackson Allison M, Deye Katherine P, Halley Tina, Hinds Tanya, Rosenthal Eric, Shalaby-Rana Eglal, Goldman Ellen F

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed medical records to identify factors contributing to not recognizing child abuse in cases where it was subsequently identified.

DESIGN/

METHODS

Eighteen cases of delayed diagnosis of physical abuse were reviewed for qualitative themes. Missed abuse was defined by prior medical encounters that revealed findings concerning for physical abuse that were not recognized.

RESULTS

Clinical limitations contributing to a delay in diagnosis included inattention to skin and subconjunctival findings, acceptance of inadequate explanations for injuries, no history obtained from verbal children, insufficient exploration of signs and symptoms, nonadherence to the maltreatment pathway, and incorrect diagnoses from radiologic examinations. System-based limitations included limited medical record access or completeness and admission to less-than-optimal settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a greater index of suspicion for abuse may mitigate missed opportunities. With variability of medical training in child abuse, the factors we identified can be used as learning objectives for continuing medical education.

Для цитирования: Jackson Allison M, Deye Katherine P, Halley Tina, Hinds Tanya, Rosenthal Eric, Shalaby-Rana Eglal, Goldman Ellen F. Curiosity and critical thinking: identifying child abuse before it is too late.. Clinical pediatrics. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0009922814549314.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.