MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037/neu0000024

Медицинская библиотека · Neuropsychology · 2013

Reading in subjects with an oral cleft: speech, hearing and neuropsychological skills.

Conrad Amy L, McCoy Thomasin E, DeVolder Ian, Richman Lynn C, Nopoulos Peg

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate speech, hearing, and neuropsychological correlates to reading among children, adolescents, and young adults with nonsyndromic cleft of the lip and/or palate (NSCL/P).

METHOD: All testing was completed in a single visit at a Midwestern university hospital. Subjects in both the NSCL/P (n = 80) and the control groups (n = 62) ranged in age from 7-26 years (average age = 17.60 and 17.66, respectively). Subjects completed a battery of standardized tests evaluating intelligence, neuropsychological skills, and word reading. Subjects with NSCL/P also underwent speech assessment, and past audiology records were evaluated.

RESULTS

After controlling for age and socioeconomic status, subjects with cleft performed significantly worse on a test of word reading. For subjects with cleft, word reading deficits were not associated with measures of speech or hearing, but were correlated with impairments in auditory memory.

CONCLUSION

These findings show poorer reading among subjects with NSCL/P compared with those without. Further work needs to focus on correlates of reading among subjects with cleft to allow early identification and appropriate intervention/accommodation for those at risk.

Для цитирования: Conrad Amy L, McCoy Thomasin E, DeVolder Ian, Richman Lynn C, Nopoulos Peg. Reading in subjects with an oral cleft: speech, hearing and neuropsychological skills.. Neuropsychology. 2013. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.