MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Nigerian journal of medicine : journal of the National Association of Resident Doctors of Nigeria · 2003

The scope of extremity amputations in a private hospital in the south-south region of Nigeria.

Ekere A U

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to review extremities amputation cases in a private medical establishment in Port Harcourt with a view to identifying the incidence, indications, and limb status at surgery.

METHODS

Hospital records were reviewed on amputation cases from June 1998 to May 2003. Upper and lower limb amputations done elsewhere with stump reviews by us were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-four cases were reviewed, with a male to female ratio of 2.1:1. The 2nd to 4th decade produced 67.6 percent of the victims. Trauma contributed 70.5 percent of the cases, with road trauma contributing 47 percent of the entire series. Gangrene as a result of injury complication was the commonest indication for surgery. Lower limb amputations were commoner (n = 24) than upper limb amputations (n = 10). Below knee amputation was the commonest procedure performed. The percentage of the patients who consulted the traditional bone setter before presentation in hospital was 33%.

CONCLUSION

Complications of injuries arising from road traffic accidents are a major cause of limb loss in our environment. Ignorance and cultural beliefs expose innocent persons to quacks especially traditional bone setters. Education and strong legislation is advocated to prevent unwarranted limb loss.

Для цитирования: Ekere A U. The scope of extremity amputations in a private hospital in the south-south region of Nigeria.. Nigerian journal of medicine : journal of the National Association of Resident Doctors of Nigeria. 2003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.