MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.05.004

Медицинская библиотека · Legal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2010

Can MRI of the neck compete with clinical findings in assessing danger to life for survivors of manual strangulation? A statistical analysis.

Christe Andreas, Oesterhelweg Lars, Ross Steffen, Spendlove Danny, Bolliger Stephan, Vock Peter, Thali Michael J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to examine the clinical forensic findings of strangulation according to their ability to differentiate between life-threatening and non-life-threatening strangulation, compare clinical and MRI findings of the neck and discuss a simple score for life-threatening strangulation (SLS).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Forensic pathologists classified a continuous sample of 56 survivors of strangulation into life-threatening cases by clinical history and examination alone. Subjective, objective and radiological signs were evaluated for discriminating the two groups.

RESULTS

In 27% of the cases life was in danger. The most significant signs of danger to life were congestive petechial hemorrhage in the face (eyes); hematoma of the neck and loss of consciousness. The radiological score could compete with the clinical scores.

CONCLUSION

Clinical forensic findings differ significantly in non-life-threatening and life-threatening manual strangulation. Thanks to MRI a rather objective test for life-threatening strangulation can be added to a SLS.

Для цитирования: Christe Andreas, Oesterhelweg Lars, Ross Steffen, Spendlove Danny, Bolliger Stephan, Vock Peter, Thali Michael J. Can MRI of the neck compete with clinical findings in assessing danger to life for survivors of manual strangulation? A statistical analysis.. Legal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.05.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.