MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2016

Five-year speech and language outcomes in children with cleft lip-palate.

Prathanee Benjamas, Pumnum Tawitree, Seepuaham Cholada, Jaiyong Pechcharat

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate 5-year speech and language outcomes in children with cleft lip/palate (CLP).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Thirty-eight children aged 4-7 years and 8 months were recruited for this study. Speech abilities including articulation, resonance, voice, and intelligibility were assessed based on Thai Universal Parameters of Speech Outcomes. Language ability was assessed by the Language Screening Test.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that children with clefts had speech and language delay, abnormal understandability, resonance abnormality, and voice disturbance; articulation defects that were 8.33 (1.75, 22.47), 50.00 (32.92, 67.08), 36.11 (20.82, 53.78), 30.56 (16.35, 48.11), and 94.44 (81.34, 99.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Articulation errors were the most common speech and language defects in children with clefts, followed by abnormal understandability, resonance abnormality, and voice disturbance. These results should be of critical concern. Protocol reviewing and early intervention programs are needed for improved speech outcomes.

Для цитирования: Prathanee Benjamas, Pumnum Tawitree, Seepuaham Cholada, Jaiyong Pechcharat. Five-year speech and language outcomes in children with cleft lip-palate.. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.