MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2217/fmb-2016-0216

Медицинская библиотека · Future microbiology · 2017

In vitro susceptibility and resistance phenotypes in contemporary Enterobacter isolates in a university hospital in Crete, Greece.

Maraki Sofia, Vardakas Konstantinos Z, Samonis George, Perdikis Dimitrios, Mavromanolaki Viktoria Eirini, Kofteridis Diamantis P, Falagas Matthew E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To study the evolution in the susceptibility of Enterobacter spp. in Crete, Greece from 2010 to 2015.

METHODS

Non-duplicate isolates were studied using automated systems. Phenotypic confirmatory tests were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 939 Enterobacter isolates were included. Colistin was the most active antibiotic (97.9%) followed by imipenem (96.1%), gentamicin (95.7%), tigecycline (91.8%), cefepime (89.4%), chloramphenicol (85.8%), fosfomycin (85.5%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (83.3%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (73.3%). Antibiotic resistance did not increase during the study period for most antibiotics. Lower susceptibility was observed among multidrug-resistant strains and carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates. AmpC was the most common resistant mechanism (21%); carbapenemases (3.7%) and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (6.5%) were also detected.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of Enterobacter spp. was resistant to several antibiotics, most notably β-lactams.

Для цитирования: Maraki Sofia, Vardakas Konstantinos Z, Samonis George, Perdikis Dimitrios, Mavromanolaki Viktoria Eirini, Kofteridis Diamantis P, Falagas Matthew E. In vitro susceptibility and resistance phenotypes in contemporary Enterobacter isolates in a university hospital in Crete, Greece.. Future microbiology. 2017. DOI: 10.2217/fmb-2016-0216.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.